I did mention awesome, but it's so configurable I couldn't do it justice in a day (plus I don't really like it, partly because it's so configurable -- I prefer minimal WMs that stay out of my way). On-topic, wmfs2 also…
Exactly. People like to point out that older window managers aren't in active development, as if this was a bad thing. To me it just means the WM is stable and doesn't need bug fixes.
I did mention awesome, but it's so configurable I couldn't do it justice in a day (plus I don't really like it, partly because it's so configurable -- I prefer minimal WMs that stay out of my way). On-topic, wmfs2 also…
Exactly. People like to point out that older window managers aren't in active development, as if this was a bad thing. To me it just means the WM is stable and doesn't need bug fixes.