> This is extremely old. I am aware that the Tor project tries to keeps their defaults sane for any use, but someone has checked that the configuration here is still valid for this use? Article was published in 2015.…
> The connection is that www.bfs.admin.ch itself will tell you... You mean the same exact domain in the first link I gave, which doesn't mention ILO, whatsoever? That `www.bfs.admin.ch`? > Picking only the one that…
> Why is there not a system that allows a business or other service to ask for government identification that is encrypted and only visible to government, but that allows a business to ask for certain details, required…
> Yes, but it’s not uniform at all. Translation: "I expect all areas to be affected the same, despite axial tilt, fluid dynamics, etc."
Sadly paywalled.
> Fish don't have AC. Spitting facts, over there. I fear a "So long, and thanks for all the fish" moment is impending.
> ...but "the company reviews each request for data it gets to ensure it is legal" just sounds like something a judge should do, no? This is assuming the first pass is before a judge. They're circumventing this by going…
> This is extremely old. I am aware that the Tor project tries to keeps their defaults sane for any use, but someone has checked that the configuration here is still valid for this use? Article was published in 2015.…
> The connection is that www.bfs.admin.ch itself will tell you... You mean the same exact domain in the first link I gave, which doesn't mention ILO, whatsoever? That `www.bfs.admin.ch`? > Picking only the one that…
> Why is there not a system that allows a business or other service to ask for government identification that is encrypted and only visible to government, but that allows a business to ask for certain details, required…
> Yes, but it’s not uniform at all. Translation: "I expect all areas to be affected the same, despite axial tilt, fluid dynamics, etc."
Sadly paywalled.
> Fish don't have AC. Spitting facts, over there. I fear a "So long, and thanks for all the fish" moment is impending.
> ...but "the company reviews each request for data it gets to ensure it is legal" just sounds like something a judge should do, no? This is assuming the first pass is before a judge. They're circumventing this by going…