3saryHg6LP2e
No user record in our sample, but 3saryHg6LP2e has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but 3saryHg6LP2e has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
I for example would never work for someone like Goldman Sachs because my perception is the work/life balance is abysmal. It's a surprise to me that anyone is surprised by this.
I have already commented with something snarky, but in seriousness: Does it it seem to anyone else that the new generation entering the workplace (zoomers?) have wildly different expectations of what it's like vs. the…
Imagine taking a job at Goldman Sachs and thinking it would be a nice, chill place to work.
This article doesn't explain how "main" is more "inclusive" than "master". I don't agree that it is at all.
Or "robot"/"bot".
It's a fairly arbitrarily number sure, but I think it could be representative. During the working week I listen to music almost all the working day, when I as commuting that adds on another couple of hours. Even if it's…
Will consumers pay that price is the question?
The record labels are a bigger problem than Spotify; they set the streaming prices and take a big cut.
Or the spreads/volatility of GME is big/frothy enough that they can make much more per trade
It is not an attachment to the words themselves it is a reaction to the idea that words have some kind of implied sinister meaning outside of the context in which they are used. And yes, I use the word "sinister"…
"guys" is literally literally defined in the dictionary[1] as: > used to address a group of people of either sex: >Come on, you guys, let's go. [1] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/guy
I hadn't seen that "sanity check" and "dummy value" were being replaced too until I see this comment. I am _dumbfounded_. But I suppose we will have to replace that word too. Jfc.
Words have different meanings in different contexts, to "floss" could be a dental hygiene procedure or it could be performing a particular dance. It is simply not the same to refer to a "master branch" as it is to a…
I do not agree with the premise that these words in context are problematic, many others do not agree with it either.
It's a very common misconception, there is no requirement for Scottish banknotes to be accepted as payment anywhere in the UK (including Scotland!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_the_pound_sterlin...
There is no such thing as "defacto" legal tender. By definition only legal tender must be accepted as a form of payment - you can choose to accept something else but you don't have to.
I mean they are not "not technically" legal tender, they are not legal tender and that is why you have problems with them being accepted (because they don't have to be!)