Is it April 1st?
Yes, ASP.NET MVC is ASP.NET, but that neither changes, nor invalidates anything that I said. a) Rails is an actual MVC framework. b) ASP.NET was an over-complicated, leaky, fairly opaque abstraction for web programming.…
You could certainly provide specific examples. How exactly is VS so much better than anything else? I've used other things that worked just as well for me. And, what is "the right direction" - MS is always moving in…
Rails is an actual MVC framework, ASP.NET was an over-complicated, leaky, fairly opaque abstraction for web programming. And it took years for MS to then come out with their own MVC framework.
It makes me think you shouldn't allow only a single person to monitor something like that...
Way to contribute.
> The US is obligated, by treaty and policy, to provide mutual defense to most of the world. That in now way sounds like it requires the US to spend an extra 800 billion per year on its military.
> What is this? Sorry, but I’m not going to watch shapes flying around my screen to find out. Oh no, that's such a terrible criticism.
Would you expect your HR or finance people to not work only 9-5?
How much is "a premium" exactly?
That's just silly, they don't even have opposable thumbs. It would have to squirt the milk into your mouth.
Is it April 1st?
Yes, ASP.NET MVC is ASP.NET, but that neither changes, nor invalidates anything that I said. a) Rails is an actual MVC framework. b) ASP.NET was an over-complicated, leaky, fairly opaque abstraction for web programming.…
You could certainly provide specific examples. How exactly is VS so much better than anything else? I've used other things that worked just as well for me. And, what is "the right direction" - MS is always moving in…
Rails is an actual MVC framework, ASP.NET was an over-complicated, leaky, fairly opaque abstraction for web programming. And it took years for MS to then come out with their own MVC framework.
It makes me think you shouldn't allow only a single person to monitor something like that...
Way to contribute.
> The US is obligated, by treaty and policy, to provide mutual defense to most of the world. That in now way sounds like it requires the US to spend an extra 800 billion per year on its military.
> What is this? Sorry, but I’m not going to watch shapes flying around my screen to find out. Oh no, that's such a terrible criticism.
Would you expect your HR or finance people to not work only 9-5?
How much is "a premium" exactly?
That's just silly, they don't even have opposable thumbs. It would have to squirt the milk into your mouth.