I dunno I can think of a couple of ways to make them economically nonviable...
Wait, so you are saying that any time the public pushes back on a new potentially dangerous technology it's a "vetocracy"?
> It has become very clear that WFH workers take extra time off at random intervals during a day Bob Slydell: You see, what we're actually trying to do here is, we're trying to get a feel for how people spend their day…
I mean, in an alternate universe where atomic weapons were a little easier to manufacture at home would it not have made sense for governments to aggressively crack down on anyone doing anything even remotely resembling…
The goal is to make silicon valley engineers part of the downtrodden proletariat. Lots of jobs used to be high paying until they weren't.
I think it's easy to mistake the concept of fads within technology with the application of arguably necessary abstractions. Most of what is new and faddish is just another abstraction around some (probably, relatively)…
I dunno I can think of a couple of ways to make them economically nonviable...
Wait, so you are saying that any time the public pushes back on a new potentially dangerous technology it's a "vetocracy"?
> It has become very clear that WFH workers take extra time off at random intervals during a day Bob Slydell: You see, what we're actually trying to do here is, we're trying to get a feel for how people spend their day…
I mean, in an alternate universe where atomic weapons were a little easier to manufacture at home would it not have made sense for governments to aggressively crack down on anyone doing anything even remotely resembling…
The goal is to make silicon valley engineers part of the downtrodden proletariat. Lots of jobs used to be high paying until they weren't.
I think it's easy to mistake the concept of fads within technology with the application of arguably necessary abstractions. Most of what is new and faddish is just another abstraction around some (probably, relatively)…