Could be. But surely we have some which survived, or can manufacture using methods of the time to check. Also, physics was in a pretty good state at the time, at least regarding temperature/length measurement. Surely…
Due to the way statistics work, you don't need to be able to measure hundredths of degree to detect a hundredth of degree average change. Because the error will distribute around the true value, thus even with sampling…
> Not because the plants grow faster, because you can grow 3x as many of them. This is against current consensus. The consensus is that plants do grow faster when you put fertilizer in the soil and the yield increase is…
If the main limit is CO2, why does adding fertilizer (nitrogen) to a field suddenly increases the yield 3 times?
Could be. But surely we have some which survived, or can manufacture using methods of the time to check. Also, physics was in a pretty good state at the time, at least regarding temperature/length measurement. Surely…
Due to the way statistics work, you don't need to be able to measure hundredths of degree to detect a hundredth of degree average change. Because the error will distribute around the true value, thus even with sampling…
> Not because the plants grow faster, because you can grow 3x as many of them. This is against current consensus. The consensus is that plants do grow faster when you put fertilizer in the soil and the yield increase is…
If the main limit is CO2, why does adding fertilizer (nitrogen) to a field suddenly increases the yield 3 times?