It conflates several legitimate issues pertaining to different agencies, their relative powers under the act. It also wilfully conflates different powers. Not to say there isn't a large amount of discussion to be had…
Yep. Anything that implies 'direct access' or 'trawling' moves from being fear mongering to simply being untrue. 'Rifling through emails' and the like is showing a poor understanding of the legislation at best and…
>None of the agencies would be required to apply for warrants to access people’s internet connection data This is misleading. All requests for any kind of Communications Data require authorisation [1] and need to…
It conflates several legitimate issues pertaining to different agencies, their relative powers under the act. It also wilfully conflates different powers. Not to say there isn't a large amount of discussion to be had…
Yep. Anything that implies 'direct access' or 'trawling' moves from being fear mongering to simply being untrue. 'Rifling through emails' and the like is showing a poor understanding of the legislation at best and…
>None of the agencies would be required to apply for warrants to access people’s internet connection data This is misleading. All requests for any kind of Communications Data require authorisation [1] and need to…