> since postgres would need to include the Apache license imho: given that postgres has many corporate forks and contributors from different companies, mixing apache 2.0 and postgresql licenses isn’t ideal - it…
Appreciate the intent! For practical adoption, especially in larger orgs, OSI-approved licences are much easier to get through legal review than custom ones.
"The differences between OrioleDB and Neon" ( June 20, 2025 ) https://www.orioledb.com/blog/orioledb-neon-differences
Apache 2.0 has a better patent clause - against hostile IP claims, so tax dispute is not terminate the OrioleDB license: "If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in…
> since postgres would need to include the Apache license imho: given that postgres has many corporate forks and contributors from different companies, mixing apache 2.0 and postgresql licenses isn’t ideal - it…
Appreciate the intent! For practical adoption, especially in larger orgs, OSI-approved licences are much easier to get through legal review than custom ones.
"The differences between OrioleDB and Neon" ( June 20, 2025 ) https://www.orioledb.com/blog/orioledb-neon-differences
Apache 2.0 has a better patent clause - against hostile IP claims, so tax dispute is not terminate the OrioleDB license: "If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in…