When we started talking about AGI a few years ago there seemed to be a relatively common consensus that LLM models could not be considered AGI because of how they work. Even if there was some changes to train the model…
I used to hear this all the time back in the early 2000's. It's far from a new idea. The version I heard (or at least the one which stuck in my head) was "your job is not to write code, your job is to solve problems".…
looks like “on any PC” means “on any Windows PC”.
Does the new Reeder app count?
At least it’s got tests … oh, wait …
When we started talking about AGI a few years ago there seemed to be a relatively common consensus that LLM models could not be considered AGI because of how they work. Even if there was some changes to train the model…
I used to hear this all the time back in the early 2000's. It's far from a new idea. The version I heard (or at least the one which stuck in my head) was "your job is not to write code, your job is to solve problems".…
looks like “on any PC” means “on any Windows PC”.
Does the new Reeder app count?
At least it’s got tests … oh, wait …