Haskell indirectly solves this by separating `trace` (a form of logging) from IO (trace is a procedure that logs function call while all other IO must be contained in an IO monad).
Had an awesome experience with german Amazon support - he was very friendly and helpful, sent an e-mail afterwards where he explained how the problem occured in more detail and got in touch with their tech team, which…
> "buy only from us or never from us" And? Seems like a valid move (from both moral and corporate perspective) to me.
if the practices used by the company were so bad and abusive, shouldn't the customers just move to another company? Voila, problem solved, the company no longer has monopoly.
> to allow the source page to carve out How would that help? If I have malicious site, I just wouldn't use that feature.
I feel like YouTube uses its monopoly to create a walled garden focused on (in their own words) advertiser-friendly content. The thing is, it makes perfect sense from their side - they will make people angry, but why…
wedding photos keep you on facebook, which means more time spent on facebook -> more ads server & more behavior tracked. If you click the news, it will take you away from facebook.
my approach to this consists of 4 security "levels": 1. I have one "throw away" password for services I don't give a fuck about 2. 2 passwords for ordinary services (breach cannot cause any serious harm and I can reset…
not really - I get the offer fairly often when looking up a route somewhere, and I don't have Uber installed.
I feel like a large part of the negativity around Node.js comes from the callback hell and almost everything being async. Solution to these two problems (an ingenious one I think) is async/await (and there is an awesome…
Haskell indirectly solves this by separating `trace` (a form of logging) from IO (trace is a procedure that logs function call while all other IO must be contained in an IO monad).
Had an awesome experience with german Amazon support - he was very friendly and helpful, sent an e-mail afterwards where he explained how the problem occured in more detail and got in touch with their tech team, which…
> "buy only from us or never from us" And? Seems like a valid move (from both moral and corporate perspective) to me.
if the practices used by the company were so bad and abusive, shouldn't the customers just move to another company? Voila, problem solved, the company no longer has monopoly.
> to allow the source page to carve out How would that help? If I have malicious site, I just wouldn't use that feature.
I feel like YouTube uses its monopoly to create a walled garden focused on (in their own words) advertiser-friendly content. The thing is, it makes perfect sense from their side - they will make people angry, but why…
wedding photos keep you on facebook, which means more time spent on facebook -> more ads server & more behavior tracked. If you click the news, it will take you away from facebook.
my approach to this consists of 4 security "levels": 1. I have one "throw away" password for services I don't give a fuck about 2. 2 passwords for ordinary services (breach cannot cause any serious harm and I can reset…
not really - I get the offer fairly often when looking up a route somewhere, and I don't have Uber installed.
I feel like a large part of the negativity around Node.js comes from the callback hell and almost everything being async. Solution to these two problems (an ingenious one I think) is async/await (and there is an awesome…