> I'm not so sure that's the case. The person who benefits from your doubt, _and_ could resolve your doubt, chooses not to.
Being critical is fine. Brad Fitzpatrick wasn't fired for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpsMkLaEiOY and Google still hosts that piece of (legitimate!) criticism.
> No, she didn't say that. Citation needed. Gebru could publish it — she's not exactly silent — but chooses not to. It's perfectly reasonable to think that someone hiding something has something to hide.
> We don't know the full list of demands Timnit is far from silent. She could share them if she wanted to. She appears to think that that would hurt rather than help her.
> I'm not so sure that's the case. The person who benefits from your doubt, _and_ could resolve your doubt, chooses not to.
Being critical is fine. Brad Fitzpatrick wasn't fired for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpsMkLaEiOY and Google still hosts that piece of (legitimate!) criticism.
> No, she didn't say that. Citation needed. Gebru could publish it — she's not exactly silent — but chooses not to. It's perfectly reasonable to think that someone hiding something has something to hide.
> We don't know the full list of demands Timnit is far from silent. She could share them if she wanted to. She appears to think that that would hurt rather than help her.