Asymmetryk
- Karma
- 11
- Created
- April 30, 2021 (5y ago)
- Submissions
- 0
the expansion of research surveillance actually only opens to new research interests the hidden and almost disused wealth accumulated at public expense over generations.
I don't suspect that my views are sympathetic with the majority of people on hn but that's why I wrote this here - admittedly in hope of being found of some interest briefly even if my comment is voted down and invisible unless the reader chooses to see down voted comments especially
the existence of a surveillance state isn't possible to dispute
it cannot be reasonably argued against
but for the whole of my life I have only seen polar argument and political alignment with essentially bipolar and absolutely extreme positions of pro or con the enforcement of powers that is carried out by technology using the very kind of skills we otherwise would applaud Cellebrite vulns aside
why don't we seek to fix this problem altogether?
the argument is always the powers that ...
when and where from can I get myself a recycled electronics gold watch / earrings for my lady geek? I feel very confident that this is going to happen, now, but I'm fascinated by the economics of the acquisition of the…
you enjoy your annual ex/cum-divi volatility and applying income tax and potentially overseas withholding taxes and exemptions and treaties rules? the administration and process involved in setting dividends isn't very…
if I may be so bold ( and presumptuous my suggestion is of any value) I wondered if your friend would like the risk and structured securities aspects of actuarial catastrophe risk markets. This pretty much has…
I don't know about today, but 15 years ago when my company held presentations about the value of print advertising that's grossly under bought, (with permission) we'd put everyone's favourite take out Pret sandwich in…
Exactly. Then the Wikipedia Foundation should calibrate their appeals accordingly and the problem is solved.
this is the second result from Google for "tedros Chinese support who election": https://www.cfr.org/blog/who-and-china-dereliction-duty
I don't understand why it's not a crime to alter or suppress medical information on political grounds in any circumstances other than possibly a absolute necessity for protecting the [vast] majority by some way eg…
so close... you need to put your car in jabberish (jedi jibberish) command console which will then correctly understand "cool jodi" as "Cool Jedi" and enter mind control mode after which you'll only have to think of…
shouldn't everyone attending a top school be decidedly coasting along in some way about their education, so they can optimise preferred areas?
I actually think this is worse for Onetto because the "one-sided story based on...Onetto..." has Onetto extolling high abstract ideas for the ostensible wellbeing of employees when he obviously needed to be presenting…
I'm inclined to think that any computer used in good faith by law enforcement duly authorized to obtain evidence ought to be considered a "protected computer if it is specifically targeted as opposed to being affected…