You actually think recent chats were used in training of these models to THEN complete the proofs? This seems incredibly far-fetched and almost impossible based on how LLMs train. Occam's Razor says that simply the…
This seems extremely unlikely to me, just more wishful thinking. To think there is going to be some other amazing technology beyond AI in a few years... hmm I sincerely doubt that.
"that is overly represented on internet forums like here. " You don't think the recent successes of Anthropic and OpenAI point to this? There are plenty more people using AI agents than that are on HN, surely you must…
"With an AI bubble implosion now all but inevitable" 2023 is calling. There is no bubble. There is no wall.
This just reads like cope, like you WANT them to be failing rather than the actual truth. Shutting down SORA proves nothing. How many products and services has Google shut down? Video is costly and wasn't going to get…
What are you talking about? You provided no evidence to your claim that you refute how good their 'inference' margins are. It is WELL known that the margins on inference are extreme across the board, something like 95%.
You need to travel more if you think Uber and Airbnb are a "scam". To be abroad in certain countries and NOT use Uber or Airbnb is potentially putting your life at risk, especially getting into random taxis. So... maybe…
[dead]
What happens when you zoom in to a human-made painting and notice an error?
The video demo is epic!
To pay for the training of the models which are getting bigger and more expensive. So intelligence is getting cheaper overall but the need for ever-increasing intelligence can't be sated.'
That's clearly a voiced bilabial fricative... so like a soft /b/ sound!
And humans don't iterate? Its a matter of time before there is nothing a human can do better than an AI in programming or math, let alone other fields.
Of course, that will last for a time, until it won't. I don't see a reason why expert humans will remain more expert than AIs.
"If you really cared about it, the code would not have stopped you doing it by hand." This is insane to me. So you have unlimited time?
Definitely not. Look at what Deepseek costs. AI companies spend a fraction on inference, it is not expensive for them to run these models like it is to train them. Coding by hand is not coming back.
I think most people would not continue to code if their coding agents stopped working, just like if the internet went down. I agree its not on the same level as the internet/electricity but its been quite a lot more…
Totally disagree. Newer models are doing much more advanced things in domains like math, programming, and cybersecurity. I don't see why a company charging more for less is a surprise or would lead to thinking that AI…
They are already turning profits and inference has shown to be a cash cow. And they've already secured compute for the next several years.
Why would it freeze if they can create more training material. Its already been shown synthetic training data is just as good if not better.
I've had access to Gemini's video models for awhile now and have done nothing with them. So who cares?
Its not pretty bad for people.
Do you think all the comments in here are positive about the model? Because they aren't. In no way does it seem astroturfed. And yeah, pretty boring to read that kind of comment every time.
When comparing OpenAI and Claude thats pretty much true, but not Gemini... And have you tried Antigravity? Yikes
Gemini Flash is a joke for coding. If you can get the same output as you can get with Sol/Astra I'm impressed. Not to mention that Antigravity is awful. It is not a universal opinion at all that general coding ability…
You actually think recent chats were used in training of these models to THEN complete the proofs? This seems incredibly far-fetched and almost impossible based on how LLMs train. Occam's Razor says that simply the…
This seems extremely unlikely to me, just more wishful thinking. To think there is going to be some other amazing technology beyond AI in a few years... hmm I sincerely doubt that.
"that is overly represented on internet forums like here. " You don't think the recent successes of Anthropic and OpenAI point to this? There are plenty more people using AI agents than that are on HN, surely you must…
"With an AI bubble implosion now all but inevitable" 2023 is calling. There is no bubble. There is no wall.
This just reads like cope, like you WANT them to be failing rather than the actual truth. Shutting down SORA proves nothing. How many products and services has Google shut down? Video is costly and wasn't going to get…
What are you talking about? You provided no evidence to your claim that you refute how good their 'inference' margins are. It is WELL known that the margins on inference are extreme across the board, something like 95%.
You need to travel more if you think Uber and Airbnb are a "scam". To be abroad in certain countries and NOT use Uber or Airbnb is potentially putting your life at risk, especially getting into random taxis. So... maybe…
[dead]
What happens when you zoom in to a human-made painting and notice an error?
The video demo is epic!
To pay for the training of the models which are getting bigger and more expensive. So intelligence is getting cheaper overall but the need for ever-increasing intelligence can't be sated.'
That's clearly a voiced bilabial fricative... so like a soft /b/ sound!
And humans don't iterate? Its a matter of time before there is nothing a human can do better than an AI in programming or math, let alone other fields.
Of course, that will last for a time, until it won't. I don't see a reason why expert humans will remain more expert than AIs.
"If you really cared about it, the code would not have stopped you doing it by hand." This is insane to me. So you have unlimited time?
Definitely not. Look at what Deepseek costs. AI companies spend a fraction on inference, it is not expensive for them to run these models like it is to train them. Coding by hand is not coming back.
I think most people would not continue to code if their coding agents stopped working, just like if the internet went down. I agree its not on the same level as the internet/electricity but its been quite a lot more…
Totally disagree. Newer models are doing much more advanced things in domains like math, programming, and cybersecurity. I don't see why a company charging more for less is a surprise or would lead to thinking that AI…
They are already turning profits and inference has shown to be a cash cow. And they've already secured compute for the next several years.
Why would it freeze if they can create more training material. Its already been shown synthetic training data is just as good if not better.
I've had access to Gemini's video models for awhile now and have done nothing with them. So who cares?
Its not pretty bad for people.
Do you think all the comments in here are positive about the model? Because they aren't. In no way does it seem astroturfed. And yeah, pretty boring to read that kind of comment every time.
When comparing OpenAI and Claude thats pretty much true, but not Gemini... And have you tried Antigravity? Yikes
Gemini Flash is a joke for coding. If you can get the same output as you can get with Sol/Astra I'm impressed. Not to mention that Antigravity is awful. It is not a universal opinion at all that general coding ability…