First of all, you have obviously no clue about any qualitative nor quantitative measure of improvement in terms of performance improvements. "Indeed awesome" is something that doesn't even relate to computer science as everything is context-dependent.

But that's not the point I want to make. What I would like people to see is what kind of profoundly uneducated, uninformed and blatantly misleading, perpetuating obvious fallacies, comments you post on this website on a daily basis. So I took about 5 minutes (but I could have literally kept on forever) to gather a sample of the kind of putrid garbage you comment daily on this website. I think that it is crucial that individuals of your kind are permanently prevented from spreading their beliefs-I insist, beliefs, not facts, when answering to people's questions. There is no ordering, all of the quotes below are equally pathetic :

1) Yep. Exactly this. If you get a laptop that a GNOME developer uses, chances are you’ll run into maybe two issues a year. But try to get GNOME to run on two 4K displays and an RTX. But here’s the thing. Linux has won. Desktop is a dying market. Linux is literally the most used operating system on phone and in the data center, which is where it counts.

>> I run three 4K displays using nVidia GeForce >> You do not cite a single number about proportions of desktops to laptops, hence you are simply assuming being right based on the fact that you think so. Corporate offices are full of desktops and I can vouch for it first hand. >> I wonder how much Microsoft/IBM DCs run Linux instead of licensed products they've been used to for years. >> Android and Linux are not the same. I would have expected from such a knowledgable computer science professor as you are to be able to discern the two.

2) Apple has transformed into a company that lags in innovation and only makes safe moves.

>> Yeah definitely haven't heard of any new chips/designs/connectors/models in the last 10 years

3) I'm very worried about the bees. My theory is that the bees are going to go extinct, and that will be the butterfly that wipes us out. At the very least it seems highly probably we'll be in a state of total anarchy in a new dark age within the next fifty years thanks in part to unethical uses of technology.

>> As much as bee extinction is an actual concern that should be addressed with particular emphasis on preserving the species, your formulation and the scenario you are extrapolating are plain and simple displays of the delusional person that you are and a medical treatment should be followed through immediately.

4) The reality of a language as large as C++ is that each project will only use a small subset of the language and libraries, and the nature of object oriented programming leads to vastly different architectures for similar problems. If you can, I would learn Rust instead. Rust is a much smaller language that purposely limits the way you use the language to encourage particularly safe practices, and tends to favor designs that are hierarchical instead of allowing hairball object graphs. Rust also guides you at the compiler level in ways that C++ programmers must learn to do by heart, or simply leak memory and create nasty patterns in their code.

>> Adequate OO implementations rely on architectural and design patterns to solve similar problems efficiently when applicable >> I am not a Rust programmer and will not comment on anything related to it's features, nevertheless I can guarantee that only a mentally deficient individual would suggest a "purposely self-limiting language" for safety reasons and stating that C++ programmers "MUST LEARN BY HEART" how to write their code as there was not any sort of documentation available on earth.

5) So I don't know how to fly a commercial airliner, but I could probably figure my way around a small single prop airplane. That's basically the difference between...