It looks like the miscommunication was _to_ him, not _from_ him. He was called in to collect his stuff, but then not fired once he got in with his boss. Personally, I had no trouble following the article.
If you disagree, can you provide a desired end point that you believe actually protects privacy, and a roadmap to get to this point? I personally don't see a path to an end point where there is no collection and…
I don't personally think it's a great outcome - in fact I think it's a pretty bad one. However, I do think that that the outcome of universal access to surveillance is the best one that has any slim likelihood at all of…
'No one gets access' has never been an option, though. It was impossible once ALPR/ANPR, or even the base technologies - OCR, large databases, and networking - were developed.
That's pretty much the business model. Copy ideas and execute faster than the original developers because they have more resources.
No TSA, which is almost worth it by itself.
It looks like the miscommunication was _to_ him, not _from_ him. He was called in to collect his stuff, but then not fired once he got in with his boss. Personally, I had no trouble following the article.
If you disagree, can you provide a desired end point that you believe actually protects privacy, and a roadmap to get to this point? I personally don't see a path to an end point where there is no collection and…
I don't personally think it's a great outcome - in fact I think it's a pretty bad one. However, I do think that that the outcome of universal access to surveillance is the best one that has any slim likelihood at all of…
'No one gets access' has never been an option, though. It was impossible once ALPR/ANPR, or even the base technologies - OCR, large databases, and networking - were developed.
That's pretty much the business model. Copy ideas and execute faster than the original developers because they have more resources.
No TSA, which is almost worth it by itself.