BoringCode
- Karma
- 219
- Created
- June 29, 2016 (10y ago)
- Submissions
- 0
I break computers.
https://bradleyrosenfeld.com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld; my proof: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld/sigs/-CT-LSu9GTK44fGj-PgV302-BVkZKy1fB1v6l7mulMI ]
Yes, there is more to life than the cult of Snowden. No reason to run around with our heads cut off just because the man gave an interview.
WSJ will show the full article if your referer header is set to twitter.com. You can do a search on Google like so: "https://www.wsj.com/articles/uber-faces-fbi-probe-overprogra... site:twitter.com"…
Don't bother, this poster is just trolling and moving the goal posts is one method to do so. You could bring up how spirited and competitive the World Baseball Classic was. How it featured teams from all over the world…
Baseball is played around the world. This comment is slightly insulting and pointless.
Misleading comment. 7.08 (a) 2 specifically applies to the scenario like in this comment: > Rule 7.08(a) Comment: Any runner after reaching first base who leaves the base path heading for his dugout or his position…
I am concurring with you. The point I'm making is that it's a matter of resources and trust, not literal "open source" that matters. If I trust an organization to put the resources towards properly auditing their…
Many open-source projects simply don't have the resources to adequately test their products or provide support. Contrast this with a large company which has the resources and the willpower to provide support for their…
> A better strategy would be to determine which ISP serves Congress, and pay them for the data of IPs originating from Congress. Except that would be illegal (and no ISP is going to sell raw data, even if they could)
Universal 2nd Factor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_2nd_Factor
Not conclusively, no.
I'm not sure speculation changes the central premise of the question. Assume that the document was up to date with the latest techniques. Would you still that consider it to be a document worth leaking for the public…
I suspected I'd see a variation of this answer in this thread. While on some level it makes sense for some cases (the information is so benign that it doesn't matter if it is leaked), in this case I don't think it quite…
If your analogy was true, there would be a stronger moral argument for revealing such information. But it isn't. I'm talking about this very specific case.
Honest question: is this the type of material that should be leaked? Is there an overriding good to revealing this document to the public? I lean towards no, but I'd be interested in discussion on this.
ZType is also really fun (and it runs in the browser) http://zty.pe/
> (If you’re wondering what data the NSA collects, its own site[1] offers a list and this statement: “The standard operating procedure for the Domestic Surveillance Directorate is to ‘collect all available information…
It's not just dead, they've yet to perform untethered flight on any of their prototypes. The Terrafugia Transition is an example of a far more practical form of "flying car"
As addressed elsewhere, the linked document is not supposed to be a proof for Russian involvement. The latter part of my comment was meant to provide some context as to why that type of information hasn't been publicly…
I'm addressing the poor thesis that "the IC has been (deliberately) wrong before, therefore they can't be trusted without an undefined amount of evidence." The points you raise are good and worth discussing, but…
I did. You're being either obtuse or are communicating your point poorly. The majority of the story is tangentially related to the statement presented in the headline. It was designed to grab your attention, "wait, why…
Their point was that judging by the headline that should have been the end of the article. Are you trying to be obtuse?
You clearly don't understand the intelligence process if this is your critique. First, the people making the DNC hack report are not the same as the analysts who worked on Iraq. The IC is not a monolith. Second, the…
That's fine, you should be skeptical. But do you really expect a nation state to say "hey, this is exactly how were are damaged. Please exploit us." That's just the nature of the intelligence business, it's hard to…
Due to the nature of this type of damage you likely won't hear any evidence for many years.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say the above poster was being sarcastic.