BoringCode
- Karma
- 219
- Created
- June 29, 2016 (10y ago)
- Submissions
- 0
I break computers.
https://bradleyrosenfeld.com
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld; my proof: https://keybase.io/bradleyrosenfeld/sigs/-CT-LSu9GTK44fGj-PgV302-BVkZKy1fB1v6l7mulMI ]
Yes, there is more to life than the cult of Snowden. No reason to run around with our heads cut off just because the man gave an interview.
Misleading comment. 7.08 (a) 2 specifically applies to the scenario like in this comment: > Rule 7.08(a) Comment: Any runner after reaching first base who leaves the base path heading for his dugout or his position…
I am concurring with you. The point I'm making is that it's a matter of resources and trust, not literal "open source" that matters. If I trust an organization to put the resources towards properly auditing their…
Many open-source projects simply don't have the resources to adequately test their products or provide support. Contrast this with a large company which has the resources and the willpower to provide support for their…
Universal 2nd Factor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_2nd_Factor
Not conclusively, no.
I'm not sure speculation changes the central premise of the question. Assume that the document was up to date with the latest techniques. Would you still that consider it to be a document worth leaking for the public…
Honest question: is this the type of material that should be leaked? Is there an overriding good to revealing this document to the public? I lean towards no, but I'd be interested in discussion on this.
ZType is also really fun (and it runs in the browser) http://zty.pe/
As addressed elsewhere, the linked document is not supposed to be a proof for Russian involvement. The latter part of my comment was meant to provide some context as to why that type of information hasn't been publicly…
I'm addressing the poor thesis that "the IC has been (deliberately) wrong before, therefore they can't be trusted without an undefined amount of evidence." The points you raise are good and worth discussing, but…
I did. You're being either obtuse or are communicating your point poorly. The majority of the story is tangentially related to the statement presented in the headline. It was designed to grab your attention, "wait, why…
Their point was that judging by the headline that should have been the end of the article. Are you trying to be obtuse?
You clearly don't understand the intelligence process if this is your critique. First, the people making the DNC hack report are not the same as the analysts who worked on Iraq. The IC is not a monolith. Second, the…
Due to the nature of this type of damage you likely won't hear any evidence for many years.
It is coming to Android early next year though.
Maybe, but those can't be deployed on a company's network.
> milquetoast I actually had to look that up. Thanks for a new word that I can throw around. I don't think a personal attack on the author helps your argument, but that's your prerogative. Also, thanks for clarifying…
Addendum: very disappointed that I got downvoted for giving my on-topic opinion. I thought HN was better than this. Many of you gave your thoughts in the comments, which is great! Debate is far preferable to abusing the…
Targeted leaking can be justified. Indiscriminately stealing information can not be. I think that's a better summary of the article. Now, there are a lot of subtleties to this, especially in regards to what Snowden…
"If any corporation is corrupt, all others must be too"
No.
IANAL (can we get a real one in here?), but it depends heavily on your jurisdiction.
As an addon developer, this annoys me. I've had to port my addons to different APIs twice in the last couple of years. Hopefully this is the end for a while.
I'm sorry, but saying without the wars there would be no terroism is just bullshit. Even saying that they were the primary cause is misinformed.