It's important to note that most of these consent boxes are not GDPR compliant.
I agree and would pose the question whether one neuron with thousands of synapses is better/different from thousands of neurons with few synapses.
Yep, in the german version it says "Anfang des Jahres verklagte die US-Regierung Lavabit auf Herausgabe ihrer SSL-Schlüssel und gewann den Prozess." So there they wrote about the correct technical details.
Yep, I instinctively clicked on one of the pages to see it bigger.
Yep, it's pro technology. He just wants to abstract the technology away behind interfaces that are simple to use.
The icons are broken in firefox because you used a webfont wich is hosted on another domain. Edit: Just saw that you already know about this: https://github.com/google/WebFundamentals/issues/13 --- Cross-Origin Request…
It's a decision by whoever writes the code for the xml feed of a site. Most of the time short snippets in the xml feed are meant to tease you so you visit their site.
It's important to note that most of these consent boxes are not GDPR compliant.
I agree and would pose the question whether one neuron with thousands of synapses is better/different from thousands of neurons with few synapses.
Yep, in the german version it says "Anfang des Jahres verklagte die US-Regierung Lavabit auf Herausgabe ihrer SSL-Schlüssel und gewann den Prozess." So there they wrote about the correct technical details.
Yep, I instinctively clicked on one of the pages to see it bigger.
Yep, it's pro technology. He just wants to abstract the technology away behind interfaces that are simple to use.
The icons are broken in firefox because you used a webfont wich is hosted on another domain. Edit: Just saw that you already know about this: https://github.com/google/WebFundamentals/issues/13 --- Cross-Origin Request…
It's a decision by whoever writes the code for the xml feed of a site. Most of the time short snippets in the xml feed are meant to tease you so you visit their site.