People voted and he won, that's democracy. You're opinion of him as a leader isn't a measure of democracy unless he's done something to undermine it.
Blame the people who put them in charge, voters
I would claim that the vast majority of people in private don't believe the majority of porn is offensive
>The Epstein-type crimes appear to be more prevalent in other branches of government and other parts of society than specifically in the legislative. Based on what?
> climate change Trump just removed Obama era greenhouse gas finding. "President Trump and Administrator Zeldin Deliver Single Largest Deregulatory Action in U.S. History"…
The comparison should be compared to the Republican party, the Democrats have done more and that's all that matters when you are making a choice between the two.
What about the ACA or Dobb-Frank?
Compared to the Republican party you believe they create less regulations?
"Both sides" This is such a tired argument that over simplifies an entire group of people on both sides into a single entity that happens to be the same.
I thought the Democrats were the party of big government and regulations whereas the Republicans were for reducing regulations?
I'm confused because you offer up that it might have always been this way but without evidence then ask us if that's the case.
Didn't the US previously make a deal then Trump broke it?
Who has been saying that?
>Edit: downvoted to -3. Did i say anything that was untrue? Or do people not like the trutH Isn't it an oversimplification to say there are no good guys? O
Because Trump has 2.5 years left and they may be hoping a Democrat wins
[dead]
Would Eurofins be able to set up monitoring on Tesla's property? What other sources would have similar pollutants to a Lithium factory? It seems pretty specific and if there was some other obvious source why wouldn't…
> A prosecutor would have to prove that you have knowingly and wilfully committed the crime in order to be convicted Why can't I just say "I didn't know I was speeding, prove I did it wilfully"
Isn't that assumed? Obviously Apple can't check every iPhone owner to see if they have been hacked now or in the past
>Some portion of them likely did not vote with this specific policy in mind. Their fault. The Republican party has been quite open about being a against environmentalism and related policies.
The voters are the source of the problem and we need to focus on them instead of Trump because once he is gone they'll just elect another piece of shit. A large portion of the population doesn't vote but if they…
>The Democratic party often sounds like a bunch of elitists Can you give an example of a Democrat politician making elitist statements? How do you know this feeling isn't the result of propaganda by the Republican party…
Voters?
Ok? And? The majority voted to move in one direction then the majority wanted to reverse it.
Neither party will ever be perfect. One is better than the other.
People voted and he won, that's democracy. You're opinion of him as a leader isn't a measure of democracy unless he's done something to undermine it.
Blame the people who put them in charge, voters
I would claim that the vast majority of people in private don't believe the majority of porn is offensive
>The Epstein-type crimes appear to be more prevalent in other branches of government and other parts of society than specifically in the legislative. Based on what?
> climate change Trump just removed Obama era greenhouse gas finding. "President Trump and Administrator Zeldin Deliver Single Largest Deregulatory Action in U.S. History"…
The comparison should be compared to the Republican party, the Democrats have done more and that's all that matters when you are making a choice between the two.
What about the ACA or Dobb-Frank?
Compared to the Republican party you believe they create less regulations?
"Both sides" This is such a tired argument that over simplifies an entire group of people on both sides into a single entity that happens to be the same.
I thought the Democrats were the party of big government and regulations whereas the Republicans were for reducing regulations?
I'm confused because you offer up that it might have always been this way but without evidence then ask us if that's the case.
Didn't the US previously make a deal then Trump broke it?
Who has been saying that?
>Edit: downvoted to -3. Did i say anything that was untrue? Or do people not like the trutH Isn't it an oversimplification to say there are no good guys? O
Because Trump has 2.5 years left and they may be hoping a Democrat wins
[dead]
Would Eurofins be able to set up monitoring on Tesla's property? What other sources would have similar pollutants to a Lithium factory? It seems pretty specific and if there was some other obvious source why wouldn't…
> A prosecutor would have to prove that you have knowingly and wilfully committed the crime in order to be convicted Why can't I just say "I didn't know I was speeding, prove I did it wilfully"
Isn't that assumed? Obviously Apple can't check every iPhone owner to see if they have been hacked now or in the past
>Some portion of them likely did not vote with this specific policy in mind. Their fault. The Republican party has been quite open about being a against environmentalism and related policies.
The voters are the source of the problem and we need to focus on them instead of Trump because once he is gone they'll just elect another piece of shit. A large portion of the population doesn't vote but if they…
>The Democratic party often sounds like a bunch of elitists Can you give an example of a Democrat politician making elitist statements? How do you know this feeling isn't the result of propaganda by the Republican party…
Voters?
Ok? And? The majority voted to move in one direction then the majority wanted to reverse it.
Neither party will ever be perfect. One is better than the other.