Both were pretty influential. Roughly speaking I think a lot of people saw T2 and thought "wow, that looks really cool in a high-tech way" and a lot of people saw Jurassic Park and thought "wow, that looks really…
> Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? I think this is pretty grossly overstating things. Yes, chat control is bad, but there's little doubt in my mind that EU regulations overall have been better for…
You could, but if you have herd immunity, you don't need to, and if you don't have herd immunity, it's a losing battle.
It's more a case for why the US system of government is a failure.
Maybe that means we shouldn't have so many large corporations.
Well, seconds, minutes, and hours are also arbitrary.
Whoop de doo. I'm sure there'll be huge earth-shaking changes in their activities now, right?
Yes, but the thing is just that if people are looking around for new providers it's an opportunity for alternative systems to attract attention and users.
That's actually the first thing that came to my mind when reading about thumb scrolling, since I use a trackball. But that wouldn't explain why left or right handed scrolling would be different.
So sad to see that no articles about this even mention Mercurial. This is a golden opportunity for Hg providers to shine.
> The right question is "what is the value (in dollars) of the right for farmers to repair their equipment". That is exactly right. That is why the punishment for not giving customers the right to repair needs to be in…
I had to read this a couple times and look at the comments here before I realized they were talking about scrolling on a phone. I was like "who scrolls with their thumb?"
I still have a bunch of these called "FromOld".
Those are many words to say "no one feels an obligation to do the right thing".
> they would never make the videos that in recent years made youtube the place it is nowadays, but they would make some other stuff. Yes, that's exactly it. What I'm saying is I'm fine with not having the videos that in…
I read all your comments and as far as I can see they presuppose that people are making videos to make money and would not otherwise make them.
Do you really not understand that people might want to do things for reasons other than money?
I think both should be in play. The financial penalties should largely apply against the individuals running the company, not just the company itself. The CEO should be in danger of losing their home and being left…
I don't really expect anything. All the people who want to make money from YouTube can just stop making stuff if money is what's motivating them.
> prison has rather hideous personal costs (for the individual and their friends and family). I mean that's kind of the point.
This is the perennial problem in our society with regulation. We're not willing to set the penalties high enough. The penalties need to be absolutely ruinous.
> As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. As a video watcher, the main issue I have with YouTube is the presence of monetization.
Relevant from a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697335 ("The case for physical media ownership").
But when will we see a return to "aspect and subject oriented programming": https://web.archive.org/web/20080705061956/http://www.alenz....
How about a sarlacc, a garbage dump, a factory pipe spilling toxic waste, etc.?
Both were pretty influential. Roughly speaking I think a lot of people saw T2 and thought "wow, that looks really cool in a high-tech way" and a lot of people saw Jurassic Park and thought "wow, that looks really…
> Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? I think this is pretty grossly overstating things. Yes, chat control is bad, but there's little doubt in my mind that EU regulations overall have been better for…
You could, but if you have herd immunity, you don't need to, and if you don't have herd immunity, it's a losing battle.
It's more a case for why the US system of government is a failure.
Maybe that means we shouldn't have so many large corporations.
Well, seconds, minutes, and hours are also arbitrary.
Whoop de doo. I'm sure there'll be huge earth-shaking changes in their activities now, right?
Yes, but the thing is just that if people are looking around for new providers it's an opportunity for alternative systems to attract attention and users.
That's actually the first thing that came to my mind when reading about thumb scrolling, since I use a trackball. But that wouldn't explain why left or right handed scrolling would be different.
So sad to see that no articles about this even mention Mercurial. This is a golden opportunity for Hg providers to shine.
> The right question is "what is the value (in dollars) of the right for farmers to repair their equipment". That is exactly right. That is why the punishment for not giving customers the right to repair needs to be in…
I had to read this a couple times and look at the comments here before I realized they were talking about scrolling on a phone. I was like "who scrolls with their thumb?"
I still have a bunch of these called "FromOld".
Those are many words to say "no one feels an obligation to do the right thing".
> they would never make the videos that in recent years made youtube the place it is nowadays, but they would make some other stuff. Yes, that's exactly it. What I'm saying is I'm fine with not having the videos that in…
I read all your comments and as far as I can see they presuppose that people are making videos to make money and would not otherwise make them.
Do you really not understand that people might want to do things for reasons other than money?
I think both should be in play. The financial penalties should largely apply against the individuals running the company, not just the company itself. The CEO should be in danger of losing their home and being left…
I don't really expect anything. All the people who want to make money from YouTube can just stop making stuff if money is what's motivating them.
> prison has rather hideous personal costs (for the individual and their friends and family). I mean that's kind of the point.
This is the perennial problem in our society with regulation. We're not willing to set the penalties high enough. The penalties need to be absolutely ruinous.
> As a professional YouTuber, the main issue I instantly see with this is the lack of monetization. As a video watcher, the main issue I have with YouTube is the presence of monetization.
Relevant from a few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697335 ("The case for physical media ownership").
But when will we see a return to "aspect and subject oriented programming": https://web.archive.org/web/20080705061956/http://www.alenz....
How about a sarlacc, a garbage dump, a factory pipe spilling toxic waste, etc.?