The piece starts out saying the iPhone is a commodity. My chair is a commodity. The physical iPhone manufactured at a Foxconn factory has aspects of a commodity. But is that physical iPhone device worth hundreds of…
To take up their seats, they would have had to swear an oath - "I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So…
I have to laugh at the Times of India (rated yellow) comment - "It tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government". Times of India, An Phoblacht, CGTN, Global Times, Press TV, Ria Novosti, Russia Today, Sputnik,…
> massively powerful, self-interested entity The difference is the union at some level ultimately has to answer to the workers who comprise the union, whereas the corporation is ultimately responsible to the majority…
> it is going to be significantly harder to start steering the company's product direction and social responsibility efforts than 'just' representing the employees during e.g. benefits and compensation negotiations.…
> While a union that represents workers interests is a good thing, I think it would be dangerous to give even a part of google to people with ideological fervor. On a practical level, a union that concentrates just on…
> an increase in labor supply due to women entering the labor force In the USA, there has been a (relative) decrease in labor supply due to women leaving the work force. Women's participation in the labor force by…
My thesis is that for the earnest young founders mentioned in the essay who want to make the world a better place and to work on X, the trouble starts when they sign a deal with VCs, super seeds etc. If they are not…
> Reporters literally can't believe it when founders making piles of money say that they started their companies to make the world better. The situation seems made for mockery. How can these founders be so naive as not…
The piece starts out saying the iPhone is a commodity. My chair is a commodity. The physical iPhone manufactured at a Foxconn factory has aspects of a commodity. But is that physical iPhone device worth hundreds of…
To take up their seats, they would have had to swear an oath - "I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So…
I have to laugh at the Times of India (rated yellow) comment - "It tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government". Times of India, An Phoblacht, CGTN, Global Times, Press TV, Ria Novosti, Russia Today, Sputnik,…
> massively powerful, self-interested entity The difference is the union at some level ultimately has to answer to the workers who comprise the union, whereas the corporation is ultimately responsible to the majority…
> it is going to be significantly harder to start steering the company's product direction and social responsibility efforts than 'just' representing the employees during e.g. benefits and compensation negotiations.…
> While a union that represents workers interests is a good thing, I think it would be dangerous to give even a part of google to people with ideological fervor. On a practical level, a union that concentrates just on…
> an increase in labor supply due to women entering the labor force In the USA, there has been a (relative) decrease in labor supply due to women leaving the work force. Women's participation in the labor force by…
My thesis is that for the earnest young founders mentioned in the essay who want to make the world a better place and to work on X, the trouble starts when they sign a deal with VCs, super seeds etc. If they are not…
> Reporters literally can't believe it when founders making piles of money say that they started their companies to make the world better. The situation seems made for mockery. How can these founders be so naive as not…