I'm pretty sure PEP 8 makes a sImilar argument for why privacy of underscore variables isn't strictly enforced in python.
Add to that a licensing fee payable to the treasury for commercial use of tax payer funded research, e.g., prescription drug patents.
I came to say the exact same thing. And they still carry "The Hacker Quarterly". http://www.barnesandnoble.com/c/2600-magazine
So I guess they should rename it Skipe open source.
I agree. A lot of the points in this review are simply irrelevant. They're talking about support for HDMI and other features not being available in default Debian distributions, the abililty to render Quake 3…
Reminds me of the old adage: You don't learn to hack, you hack to learn.
There are so many other problems with email that could be addressed by a new protocol, eg: spam, security. There are measures to address these issues more broadly with SMTP, but they are not widely adopted, something…
I'm pretty sure PEP 8 makes a sImilar argument for why privacy of underscore variables isn't strictly enforced in python.
Add to that a licensing fee payable to the treasury for commercial use of tax payer funded research, e.g., prescription drug patents.
I came to say the exact same thing. And they still carry "The Hacker Quarterly". http://www.barnesandnoble.com/c/2600-magazine
So I guess they should rename it Skipe open source.
I agree. A lot of the points in this review are simply irrelevant. They're talking about support for HDMI and other features not being available in default Debian distributions, the abililty to render Quake 3…
Reminds me of the old adage: You don't learn to hack, you hack to learn.
There are so many other problems with email that could be addressed by a new protocol, eg: spam, security. There are measures to address these issues more broadly with SMTP, but they are not widely adopted, something…