I read the overclocking ssl posting (http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.ht...) & I've been seeing plenty of follow up about how SSL is cheap and easy to scale, but I have yet to see one…
"This is where the reporting becomes interesting. I think this relates to a strong impulse to see Mr. Zuckerberg get some sort of comeuppance for whatever reason." I have a more interesting theory on why this reporting…
Original article reeks of linkbait. Counterculture versus The Man. Flippant startup versus entrenched corporation. Think different versus rethink possible. And a bunch of hacker newsers get all excited about a quote…
Nexus 1. Has it shaken the industry? No manufacturers are stepping up their game and google is crying uncle on the goitalone, unsubsidized model.
It is interesting, but I think it is a dead end. The concept is possible because GSM doesn't require mutual authentication. Consequently, devices can "relatively" easily attach to a tower, if a bunch of circumstances…
I read the overclocking ssl posting (http://www.imperialviolet.org/2010/06/25/overclocking-ssl.ht...) & I've been seeing plenty of follow up about how SSL is cheap and easy to scale, but I have yet to see one…
"This is where the reporting becomes interesting. I think this relates to a strong impulse to see Mr. Zuckerberg get some sort of comeuppance for whatever reason." I have a more interesting theory on why this reporting…
Original article reeks of linkbait. Counterculture versus The Man. Flippant startup versus entrenched corporation. Think different versus rethink possible. And a bunch of hacker newsers get all excited about a quote…
Nexus 1. Has it shaken the industry? No manufacturers are stepping up their game and google is crying uncle on the goitalone, unsubsidized model.
It is interesting, but I think it is a dead end. The concept is possible because GSM doesn't require mutual authentication. Consequently, devices can "relatively" easily attach to a tower, if a bunch of circumstances…