A lot of vlang-related statistics are very suspicious, probably some of the metrics are boosted by a click farm or something similar. For example, 99% of the global google searches about "vlang" are from Beijing.…
You completely misunderstood what this project does. This kind of libraries do not force you to return results in a specific way. Generally they allow the programmer to customize how the results are scored and chosen.
That's not true. The real problem is that he is implying that his software is faster than Lucene showing data from a benchmark that has substantial flaws. The reason why the majority of criticism comes from Lucene users…
He is beating lucene only if you look at his broken benchmark
The funny thing is that the benchmarks that he wrote are more problematic than the T-WAND code itself. He didn't use any benchmarking library, and he used System.currentTimeMillis instead of the high precision timer…
The benchmarks in question have several implementation issues, I reported them on GitHub. https://github.com/juji-io/datalevin/issues/created_by/caval...
Now it's online
Looking at gitly repository it almost has no features, only a fraction of the basic git features are present, and they are barely working. Why is it being advertised here on HN as a fast alternative of github/gitlab?…
It seems they only like it in Beijing https://imgur.com/a/dyFOVu1 Pretty weird fanbase, isn't it?
Interesting how the interest in China is completely focused ONLY in Beijing and everywhere else no one ever cared about vlang. https://imgur.com/a/dyFOVu1 Click farms maybe?
A lot of vlang-related statistics are very suspicious, probably some of the metrics are boosted by a click farm or something similar. For example, 99% of the global google searches about "vlang" are from Beijing.…
You completely misunderstood what this project does. This kind of libraries do not force you to return results in a specific way. Generally they allow the programmer to customize how the results are scored and chosen.
That's not true. The real problem is that he is implying that his software is faster than Lucene showing data from a benchmark that has substantial flaws. The reason why the majority of criticism comes from Lucene users…
He is beating lucene only if you look at his broken benchmark
The funny thing is that the benchmarks that he wrote are more problematic than the T-WAND code itself. He didn't use any benchmarking library, and he used System.currentTimeMillis instead of the high precision timer…
The benchmarks in question have several implementation issues, I reported them on GitHub. https://github.com/juji-io/datalevin/issues/created_by/caval...
Now it's online
Looking at gitly repository it almost has no features, only a fraction of the basic git features are present, and they are barely working. Why is it being advertised here on HN as a fast alternative of github/gitlab?…
It seems they only like it in Beijing https://imgur.com/a/dyFOVu1 Pretty weird fanbase, isn't it?
Interesting how the interest in China is completely focused ONLY in Beijing and everywhere else no one ever cared about vlang. https://imgur.com/a/dyFOVu1 Click farms maybe?