I guess you can agree with a meta-satire of your comment.
woosh
Not really: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24969112
Why is it acceptable when police walk around with a handgun, but "disturbing the peace" when normal people do the same thing? Why is it acceptable when police stop people for breaking traffic laws, but "false…
The state divides aren't nearly as significant as the urban/rural divides. Practically every state red or blue has blue cities and red rural areas.
So would this university take down a mural of the 442nd Infantry Regiment too, for not being diverse enough? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/442nd_Infantry_Regiment_(Unite... "The unit earned more than 18,000 awards in…
That's a very interesting perspective that would explain a lot of behavior.
> Elections still happened during the U.S. Civil War and both World Wars. Did they close down schools for that? Did they hold elections during the 1918 Pandemic? Let's have an honest comparison here.
It'll take more tries, but eventually the fourth one will stay up.
You need to think about it a little more. In the story, the admiral is conceited about his position so much so that he believes that he has the right not to understand the situation. Which is exactly why the commenter…
Well, they are throwing unspecified bottles of liquid at them, so they're not peaceful protesters either.
“This is a lighthouse. Your call.”
> Also, one loud rioter was calling out individual officers promising them that they would find out where they live and kill them and their families. And then people are surprised at the news articles about officers…
Which use of the LVNR caused "1 month of protest and billions of dollars lost"?
Telling of what? That they reuse a term?
> I was making the point and deleted it because of the kind of misrepresentation that you just made. Convenient, rather than modify it to clarify the vagueness you instead deleted it. Now no one can see for themselves…
As was mentioned in another comment, memexy is in Phase 1 - mischaracterize
Not to all people, and not necessarily to the commenter you are responding to.
> So then you weren't asking the question in good faith. Yes, I was. > When I asked you to clarify you dodged the question. I wouldn't ask if I knew, I asked because I didn't know what you were referring to. If you…
> andrewprock already found an example and I agree with his assessment. But do you have a dispute for the counterpoint from mst? If so, what is it?
> debate semantics until they're blue in the face. > I'm drawing a line between UTILITY and MURDER. The irony is so thick here, especially when you're talking about a search engine.
That's a lot of words to concede that it wasn't based on reality, as the other poster said. :)
> Police officers getting "almost killed"? Your comment only addresses dead, not almost killed as the comment you are replying to.
In that case be prepared to defend the claim of it being without justification. Which if it truly is as clear cut as you're making it out to be, should not be a problem at all.
Be careful what you wish for: Facebook applies dubious “false info” fact-check label to Patriot Act video https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23356373
I guess you can agree with a meta-satire of your comment.
woosh
Not really: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24969112
Why is it acceptable when police walk around with a handgun, but "disturbing the peace" when normal people do the same thing? Why is it acceptable when police stop people for breaking traffic laws, but "false…
The state divides aren't nearly as significant as the urban/rural divides. Practically every state red or blue has blue cities and red rural areas.
So would this university take down a mural of the 442nd Infantry Regiment too, for not being diverse enough? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/442nd_Infantry_Regiment_(Unite... "The unit earned more than 18,000 awards in…
That's a very interesting perspective that would explain a lot of behavior.
> Elections still happened during the U.S. Civil War and both World Wars. Did they close down schools for that? Did they hold elections during the 1918 Pandemic? Let's have an honest comparison here.
It'll take more tries, but eventually the fourth one will stay up.
You need to think about it a little more. In the story, the admiral is conceited about his position so much so that he believes that he has the right not to understand the situation. Which is exactly why the commenter…
Well, they are throwing unspecified bottles of liquid at them, so they're not peaceful protesters either.
“This is a lighthouse. Your call.”
> Also, one loud rioter was calling out individual officers promising them that they would find out where they live and kill them and their families. And then people are surprised at the news articles about officers…
Which use of the LVNR caused "1 month of protest and billions of dollars lost"?
Telling of what? That they reuse a term?
> I was making the point and deleted it because of the kind of misrepresentation that you just made. Convenient, rather than modify it to clarify the vagueness you instead deleted it. Now no one can see for themselves…
As was mentioned in another comment, memexy is in Phase 1 - mischaracterize
Not to all people, and not necessarily to the commenter you are responding to.
> So then you weren't asking the question in good faith. Yes, I was. > When I asked you to clarify you dodged the question. I wouldn't ask if I knew, I asked because I didn't know what you were referring to. If you…
> andrewprock already found an example and I agree with his assessment. But do you have a dispute for the counterpoint from mst? If so, what is it?
> debate semantics until they're blue in the face. > I'm drawing a line between UTILITY and MURDER. The irony is so thick here, especially when you're talking about a search engine.
That's a lot of words to concede that it wasn't based on reality, as the other poster said. :)
> Police officers getting "almost killed"? Your comment only addresses dead, not almost killed as the comment you are replying to.
In that case be prepared to defend the claim of it being without justification. Which if it truly is as clear cut as you're making it out to be, should not be a problem at all.
Be careful what you wish for: Facebook applies dubious “false info” fact-check label to Patriot Act video https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23356373