I think if they did support Apple Pencil they’d have used that as a selling point.
As someone who does coding and art, I’m disappointed that there’s no Apple Pencil support. Makes touch feel more like a gimmick.
There are reasonable, practical limits to the agent power available to a given person. If I'm sawing wood I could compare a knife to a handsaw, to an electric saw, to a table saw, to a team of woodworkers, to a factory,…
You could give the task to a million people but you could also give the task to a million people who each have their own swarm of agents. I think it makes sense to focus on what one individual can do, and amount of time…
The point of technology is to make people’s lives better. Out of curiosity, when you take a bite of a burger do you call it a product? When you watch a movie do you call it content?
Real housing prices are the most expensive they've been in recent history, but sure it's almost entirely doomscrolling.
I don’t think it’s as simple as that. It seems like people are increasingly exhausted and disillusioned with life. What you seem to be implying is people are lazy and choosing TikTok over real relationships. But I also…
I was recently working on audio code, and I needed a function that produced a fast approximation of a sine wave. I asked chatgpt about common techniques, did some experiments to figure out the right performance/accuracy…
It’s really not that confusing. The problem is people keep adding stuff to the definition that doesn’t really matter, and twisting it to serve themselves, then calling it confusing. What really matters are the core…
And the brain is literally only producing electrochemical signals. I don’t see how tokens can’t produce speech or track metabolic needs. You can talk to chatgpt can’t you? Or do you mean literally talking? Because…
I’ve been learning houdini recently, and I have to agree. In terms of nodes and simulation, Houdini is still lightyears ahead of blender. I say this as someone who loves blender and views the programs as complementary.…
That suggests a straightforward mapping between context -> program. Maybe for trivial programs but I don’t see how you can argue that for sufficiently complex programs. Reasoning models perform better than non-reasoning…
MIT is simple, open, and common which is a big benefit for indie projects, small studios, and anyone with limited legal resources. It means there’s lots of info on the internet explaining how to use the license and they…
I find this whole conversation baffling. Licenses and contracts are not a replacement for being a decent person.
Because there’s a clear mismatch between the value generated from Box2d vs the value the creator receives, and that’s common for open-source in general. It would be common decency to donate even a small portion of that…
The root level comment is talking about their general vision of healthcare. We’re talking about ideal goals here. Whether midjourney helps with those goals or not is a related, but different conversation thread.
Because we’ve been able to spend more and more on the next miniaturization. That does not seem infinitely sustainable or even physically possible to sustain indefinitely.
Capitalism is trending towards uncertainty. - Job security is getting lower. - Insurance is getting spotty, will this be covered? Maybe? - Companies are testing dynamic pricing. - The rise of prediction markets.…
I think this will be one of those things that the hacker news crowd lambasts and calls a mistake but will either be neutral or seen as a positive to your average user.
Do you have any idea how much it costs to build a frontier model and how much money it takes to enable R&D at the cutting edge?
Appeals to individualism and capitalism, why am I not surprised.
I’m so intensely sick of this attitude. We are losing things with technology. Important things. Human things. Looking under a microscope at one specific instance and saying “eh it’s not that bad, you’re overreacting” is…
So there’s no difference at all? Making everybody have brown hair is the same as giving everyone down syndrome?
All analogies are flawed and I think you’re taking the wrong message here. If doctors gave mothers a vaccine that prevented down syndrome, at a high level, that would be the same as putting an anti-down syndrome drug in…
This post is about curing down syndrome though. Saying “but they’re happy” in this context is implying that we shouldn’t try to cure it, which is obviously ridiculous.
I think if they did support Apple Pencil they’d have used that as a selling point.
As someone who does coding and art, I’m disappointed that there’s no Apple Pencil support. Makes touch feel more like a gimmick.
There are reasonable, practical limits to the agent power available to a given person. If I'm sawing wood I could compare a knife to a handsaw, to an electric saw, to a table saw, to a team of woodworkers, to a factory,…
You could give the task to a million people but you could also give the task to a million people who each have their own swarm of agents. I think it makes sense to focus on what one individual can do, and amount of time…
The point of technology is to make people’s lives better. Out of curiosity, when you take a bite of a burger do you call it a product? When you watch a movie do you call it content?
Real housing prices are the most expensive they've been in recent history, but sure it's almost entirely doomscrolling.
I don’t think it’s as simple as that. It seems like people are increasingly exhausted and disillusioned with life. What you seem to be implying is people are lazy and choosing TikTok over real relationships. But I also…
I was recently working on audio code, and I needed a function that produced a fast approximation of a sine wave. I asked chatgpt about common techniques, did some experiments to figure out the right performance/accuracy…
It’s really not that confusing. The problem is people keep adding stuff to the definition that doesn’t really matter, and twisting it to serve themselves, then calling it confusing. What really matters are the core…
And the brain is literally only producing electrochemical signals. I don’t see how tokens can’t produce speech or track metabolic needs. You can talk to chatgpt can’t you? Or do you mean literally talking? Because…
I’ve been learning houdini recently, and I have to agree. In terms of nodes and simulation, Houdini is still lightyears ahead of blender. I say this as someone who loves blender and views the programs as complementary.…
That suggests a straightforward mapping between context -> program. Maybe for trivial programs but I don’t see how you can argue that for sufficiently complex programs. Reasoning models perform better than non-reasoning…
MIT is simple, open, and common which is a big benefit for indie projects, small studios, and anyone with limited legal resources. It means there’s lots of info on the internet explaining how to use the license and they…
I find this whole conversation baffling. Licenses and contracts are not a replacement for being a decent person.
Because there’s a clear mismatch between the value generated from Box2d vs the value the creator receives, and that’s common for open-source in general. It would be common decency to donate even a small portion of that…
The root level comment is talking about their general vision of healthcare. We’re talking about ideal goals here. Whether midjourney helps with those goals or not is a related, but different conversation thread.
Because we’ve been able to spend more and more on the next miniaturization. That does not seem infinitely sustainable or even physically possible to sustain indefinitely.
Capitalism is trending towards uncertainty. - Job security is getting lower. - Insurance is getting spotty, will this be covered? Maybe? - Companies are testing dynamic pricing. - The rise of prediction markets.…
I think this will be one of those things that the hacker news crowd lambasts and calls a mistake but will either be neutral or seen as a positive to your average user.
Do you have any idea how much it costs to build a frontier model and how much money it takes to enable R&D at the cutting edge?
Appeals to individualism and capitalism, why am I not surprised.
I’m so intensely sick of this attitude. We are losing things with technology. Important things. Human things. Looking under a microscope at one specific instance and saying “eh it’s not that bad, you’re overreacting” is…
So there’s no difference at all? Making everybody have brown hair is the same as giving everyone down syndrome?
All analogies are flawed and I think you’re taking the wrong message here. If doctors gave mothers a vaccine that prevented down syndrome, at a high level, that would be the same as putting an anti-down syndrome drug in…
This post is about curing down syndrome though. Saying “but they’re happy” in this context is implying that we shouldn’t try to cure it, which is obviously ridiculous.