Not everyone is as confident in their writing as they are in their engineering
Sometimes, but I feel like more than 50% are good (or I’ve been lucky) - I read their profiles online at psychologytoday.com and pick a few that seems to fit me. I then call and see if they have open appointments
More often it's the difference between finishing something and not finishing it - so often LLM's are helping them reach an audience that would appreciate them, even if that audience doesn't include you
I tend to see far more obvious bots attacking Claude than any other - which makes sense, they're winning.
These days anytime I want an extension I'm just asking Claude to build it. Has no problem knocking them out. I'm pretty certain Claude could have built any of these features in the malicious extensions in one shot
If it's valuable enough to someone, and it isn't keeping up, someone will pay. If it's not valuable enough for someone to pay, then who cares?
I don’t trust this was the result of a normal prompt
Which would make sense if they chose strategies that might stop that from happening. Instead the ones I know refuse to even learn what AI can do and refuse to see that they're not going to slow it's adoption down by…
You do not represent everyone
I think there are many valid reasons to be against them - I think a lot of them are more right than wrong. It’s the “It can’t really do much” that I think must be from people that haven’t really tried it.
Ideas and functionality beget more ideas and functionality
This argument feels like A: The sky is blue! B: No it's not. A: Yes, it is, please look up. B: No, you must prove it to me through reason. A: But, if you would just pretty please look up. B: No. I run a company, I've…
Very very fast steam rollers.
Plus, if you're black hat utilizing prompt injection or a living, you're probably unlikely to have been willing to share your methods in this test. This is likely made up mostly of people testing that are not experts in…
Makes sense to me that it wouldn’t. You’re effectively saying you’re willing to trade future use for priority access now. Of course they’re going to use that to reach a more favorable price tradeoff for themselves
Isn't that effectively what they've done in regards to chinese cars?
Seems like a booby trap to me, which is illegal. I suspect if one of these does enough damage there will be laws against it. The intent was to destroy - still I sympathize with the desire to have their terms followed,…
There is plenty of work that does not need to be perfectly verified, because the risk is controlled. Prototyping a javascript game for example. Or code that runs just on your local machine where good enough is good…
This would be like someone 40 years ago asking who Donald Trump is. It may not effect you yet but it likely will someday. Ignoring these people does not seem to help them go away
What part is wrong?
We’re so close guys! Another 25 years and we might almost be there!
I’d rather not rely on a government owning it that has been very open about their desire to control what people perceive as true
I’ve had what was told to me is a 10, you don’t always pass out, unfortunately
My understanding of the heart rate correlation to lifespan between different species is that it is “within a couple levels of magnitude” and that an increase of 10% in a human’s rate does not correlate at all to a 10%…
I feel like that example is missing some context - if signups did increase then their experiment was successful - we aren’t here to make pretty pages, we’re here to make money.
Not everyone is as confident in their writing as they are in their engineering
Sometimes, but I feel like more than 50% are good (or I’ve been lucky) - I read their profiles online at psychologytoday.com and pick a few that seems to fit me. I then call and see if they have open appointments
More often it's the difference between finishing something and not finishing it - so often LLM's are helping them reach an audience that would appreciate them, even if that audience doesn't include you
I tend to see far more obvious bots attacking Claude than any other - which makes sense, they're winning.
These days anytime I want an extension I'm just asking Claude to build it. Has no problem knocking them out. I'm pretty certain Claude could have built any of these features in the malicious extensions in one shot
If it's valuable enough to someone, and it isn't keeping up, someone will pay. If it's not valuable enough for someone to pay, then who cares?
I don’t trust this was the result of a normal prompt
Which would make sense if they chose strategies that might stop that from happening. Instead the ones I know refuse to even learn what AI can do and refuse to see that they're not going to slow it's adoption down by…
You do not represent everyone
I think there are many valid reasons to be against them - I think a lot of them are more right than wrong. It’s the “It can’t really do much” that I think must be from people that haven’t really tried it.
Ideas and functionality beget more ideas and functionality
This argument feels like A: The sky is blue! B: No it's not. A: Yes, it is, please look up. B: No, you must prove it to me through reason. A: But, if you would just pretty please look up. B: No. I run a company, I've…
Very very fast steam rollers.
Plus, if you're black hat utilizing prompt injection or a living, you're probably unlikely to have been willing to share your methods in this test. This is likely made up mostly of people testing that are not experts in…
Makes sense to me that it wouldn’t. You’re effectively saying you’re willing to trade future use for priority access now. Of course they’re going to use that to reach a more favorable price tradeoff for themselves
Isn't that effectively what they've done in regards to chinese cars?
Seems like a booby trap to me, which is illegal. I suspect if one of these does enough damage there will be laws against it. The intent was to destroy - still I sympathize with the desire to have their terms followed,…
There is plenty of work that does not need to be perfectly verified, because the risk is controlled. Prototyping a javascript game for example. Or code that runs just on your local machine where good enough is good…
This would be like someone 40 years ago asking who Donald Trump is. It may not effect you yet but it likely will someday. Ignoring these people does not seem to help them go away
What part is wrong?
We’re so close guys! Another 25 years and we might almost be there!
I’d rather not rely on a government owning it that has been very open about their desire to control what people perceive as true
I’ve had what was told to me is a 10, you don’t always pass out, unfortunately
My understanding of the heart rate correlation to lifespan between different species is that it is “within a couple levels of magnitude” and that an increase of 10% in a human’s rate does not correlate at all to a 10%…
I feel like that example is missing some context - if signups did increase then their experiment was successful - we aren’t here to make pretty pages, we’re here to make money.