KGB tool. Hence beloved.
The 11+ is long gone.
Because I do have a CS degree and can program in several functional languages I can glance at your link and see how that parser works. Mind you, you're right re the BDFL stuff. FT.
Access is still a relational database. Grind on. Get the ticket.
laughable.
VB6! are you a time traveller?
> 1991 !?! Java, F# and Scala didn't exist then.
They're dead on the first day.
"You have to contend with Python’s broken notion of lambda but other than that it’s not really that different" http://www.gigamonkeys.com/code-quarterly/2011/hal-abelson/
> Many of Scalas abstractions, unlike Kotlin, have runtime cost Got a source for that?
> but I had this (perhaps naive) idea that if I became an excellent practitioner in whatever I did the money would follow. It wont.
KGB tool. Hence beloved.
The 11+ is long gone.
Because I do have a CS degree and can program in several functional languages I can glance at your link and see how that parser works. Mind you, you're right re the BDFL stuff. FT.
Access is still a relational database. Grind on. Get the ticket.
laughable.
VB6! are you a time traveller?
> 1991 !?! Java, F# and Scala didn't exist then.
They're dead on the first day.
"You have to contend with Python’s broken notion of lambda but other than that it’s not really that different" http://www.gigamonkeys.com/code-quarterly/2011/hal-abelson/
> Many of Scalas abstractions, unlike Kotlin, have runtime cost Got a source for that?
> but I had this (perhaps naive) idea that if I became an excellent practitioner in whatever I did the money would follow. It wont.