You're wrong. People getting angry at West and talking about war. Including nuclear.
> 802.11ac is a 5-GHz-only technology https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/wirele...
dig @9.9.9.11 +short ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached dig @9.9.9.12 +short ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Should, but does not. dig @8.8.8.8 o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com txt +short "74.125.46.11" "edns0-client-subnet 94.181.44.185/32" dig @9.9.9.10 o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com txt +short "2620:171:57::240"
I have static public /32. My ISP intercepting DNS traffic for censorship purposes. But i strongly doubt that this traffic is forwarded somewhere. [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com @8.8.8.8 +short…
Load balancing of ECS?
I think i have questions to Google: [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.l.google.com @8.8.8.8 +short "74.125.46.8" "edns0-client-subnet 92.223.114.166/32" [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.l.google.com @8.8.8.8…
ISP can do anything with you DNS traffic. That's why Cloudflare DNS support DNS-over-TLS.
Quad9 not friendly to CDN. $ dig +short @8.8.8.8 icnerd-1e5f.kxcdn.com p-rumo00.kxcdn.com. 188.42.31.172 $ dig +short @1.1.1.1 icnerd-1e5f.kxcdn.com p-rumo00.kxcdn.com. 188.42.31.172 $ dig +short @9.9.9.9…
It does. $ dig @9.9.9.10 +dnssec +short verisignlabs.com 72.13.58.64 A 8 2 3600 20180413202737 20180330202737 31485 verisignlabs.com. KrnT9i6qytaYWDZWThBmBwc6anOmawNxJTxmSlpaY3L7Yfupga9FS70l…
Don't know about other OEMs but Xiaomi's implementation is awful.
You're wrong. People getting angry at West and talking about war. Including nuclear.
> 802.11ac is a 5-GHz-only technology https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/wirele...
dig @9.9.9.11 +short ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached dig @9.9.9.12 +short ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Should, but does not. dig @8.8.8.8 o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com txt +short "74.125.46.11" "edns0-client-subnet 94.181.44.185/32" dig @9.9.9.10 o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com txt +short "2620:171:57::240"
I have static public /32. My ISP intercepting DNS traffic for censorship purposes. But i strongly doubt that this traffic is forwarded somewhere. [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.test.l.google.com @8.8.8.8 +short…
Load balancing of ECS?
I think i have questions to Google: [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.l.google.com @8.8.8.8 +short "74.125.46.8" "edns0-client-subnet 92.223.114.166/32" [user@v-fed-1 ~]$ dig txt o-o.myaddr.l.google.com @8.8.8.8…
ISP can do anything with you DNS traffic. That's why Cloudflare DNS support DNS-over-TLS.
Quad9 not friendly to CDN. $ dig +short @8.8.8.8 icnerd-1e5f.kxcdn.com p-rumo00.kxcdn.com. 188.42.31.172 $ dig +short @1.1.1.1 icnerd-1e5f.kxcdn.com p-rumo00.kxcdn.com. 188.42.31.172 $ dig +short @9.9.9.9…
It does. $ dig @9.9.9.10 +dnssec +short verisignlabs.com 72.13.58.64 A 8 2 3600 20180413202737 20180330202737 31485 verisignlabs.com. KrnT9i6qytaYWDZWThBmBwc6anOmawNxJTxmSlpaY3L7Yfupga9FS70l…
Don't know about other OEMs but Xiaomi's implementation is awful.