They're just letting anyone make a Wikipedia page these days huh
"Discord becomes strife cause that means kinda the same thing, strife becomes strafe cause that's a gamer term" is the completely german-less train-of-thought I could imagine leading to this name
>"What's 1+1, and don't say 2"?
>So because TUIs look universally bad You can't stay engaged if the menus don't bleep and bloop at you and confetti rains down on every click? That's a personal problem. A minimal UI is not automatically a bad-looking…
"One man's modus ponens..."
Nice Unthinkable Topic you have there.
>"Everybody experiences the world in a different way, and yet everybody assumes that everyone else experiences the world the same way they do." Relevant article: "Generalizing from one…
It is a bit strange, like being surprised some countries drive on the left side. xkcd 1053 of course, but people are still allowed to be surprised when someone went their entire life without picking up a fairly common…
What's wrong with tiny people? ;)
>not comparable to all this In the literal sense that a gun is not a chatbot? True. In the sense that both your post and my analogy use the argument "this is assistive technology" to defend something which only in a…
The former. I'm not sure what you mean by metadata, but my expectation was that anything that Claude could put into the plaintext to identify itself may plausibly also accidentally be produced by [a million monkeys on…
I notice the "Limitations" section talks about how content only at some point touched by Claude may return a positive, and content that returns a negative may still be Claude generated. But I really would have liked for…
Back in the eighties we had to jerk off all our clients manually
I did understand that analogy from your first comment, because I have neither been living under a rock for the past few years nor suffered a heavy concussion minutes before making my reply. That may seem needlessly…
Using LLMs to find errors and using LLMs to produce error-free artifacts are two extremely different levels of challenge.
>Locally we've got an overpopulation of goats, and apparently they're going to start shooting them from helicopters. Metal!
Pentagons are plenty occult fnord!
Wow, it's so human already!
You actually aren't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prey_(2006_video_game)
You haven't been putting in any good-faith effort into having a "productive conversation" for at least three of your responses, setting up "This is how things are" with no attempt to support this with any arguments, and…
>just to be clear we are discussing gambling and not investing Where's the demarcation? The whole point of this sub-thread was "you absolutely can predict the outcome of some of these markets". If you do your due…
Not only did you miss the point of the conversation entirely, you're attacking a point I explicitly addressed in my comment. I well understand how the system works, ggps comment had me confused about their perspective.
Except you knew it was a lie, and they knew that you knew it was a lie, and you knew that they knew that you knew it was a lie. There was exactly zero deception. At a certain point it's marketing, advertising,…
You're sneaking in a prior assumption that people will act stupidly, and then make the argument "Well since they act stupidly they will have bad outcomes". That's like me claiming "Your startup is gonna fail, I can…
I'm confused by how you're modeling these markets. Let's say I am quite sure that the Steam Machine will cost more than $700 dollars, and I buy a 'yes' lot for 65 cents on the payed-out dollar, those are the odds at my…
They're just letting anyone make a Wikipedia page these days huh
"Discord becomes strife cause that means kinda the same thing, strife becomes strafe cause that's a gamer term" is the completely german-less train-of-thought I could imagine leading to this name
>"What's 1+1, and don't say 2"?
>So because TUIs look universally bad You can't stay engaged if the menus don't bleep and bloop at you and confetti rains down on every click? That's a personal problem. A minimal UI is not automatically a bad-looking…
"One man's modus ponens..."
Nice Unthinkable Topic you have there.
>"Everybody experiences the world in a different way, and yet everybody assumes that everyone else experiences the world the same way they do." Relevant article: "Generalizing from one…
It is a bit strange, like being surprised some countries drive on the left side. xkcd 1053 of course, but people are still allowed to be surprised when someone went their entire life without picking up a fairly common…
What's wrong with tiny people? ;)
>not comparable to all this In the literal sense that a gun is not a chatbot? True. In the sense that both your post and my analogy use the argument "this is assistive technology" to defend something which only in a…
The former. I'm not sure what you mean by metadata, but my expectation was that anything that Claude could put into the plaintext to identify itself may plausibly also accidentally be produced by [a million monkeys on…
I notice the "Limitations" section talks about how content only at some point touched by Claude may return a positive, and content that returns a negative may still be Claude generated. But I really would have liked for…
Back in the eighties we had to jerk off all our clients manually
I did understand that analogy from your first comment, because I have neither been living under a rock for the past few years nor suffered a heavy concussion minutes before making my reply. That may seem needlessly…
Using LLMs to find errors and using LLMs to produce error-free artifacts are two extremely different levels of challenge.
>Locally we've got an overpopulation of goats, and apparently they're going to start shooting them from helicopters. Metal!
Pentagons are plenty occult fnord!
Wow, it's so human already!
You actually aren't: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prey_(2006_video_game)
You haven't been putting in any good-faith effort into having a "productive conversation" for at least three of your responses, setting up "This is how things are" with no attempt to support this with any arguments, and…
>just to be clear we are discussing gambling and not investing Where's the demarcation? The whole point of this sub-thread was "you absolutely can predict the outcome of some of these markets". If you do your due…
Not only did you miss the point of the conversation entirely, you're attacking a point I explicitly addressed in my comment. I well understand how the system works, ggps comment had me confused about their perspective.
Except you knew it was a lie, and they knew that you knew it was a lie, and you knew that they knew that you knew it was a lie. There was exactly zero deception. At a certain point it's marketing, advertising,…
You're sneaking in a prior assumption that people will act stupidly, and then make the argument "Well since they act stupidly they will have bad outcomes". That's like me claiming "Your startup is gonna fail, I can…
I'm confused by how you're modeling these markets. Let's say I am quite sure that the Steam Machine will cost more than $700 dollars, and I buy a 'yes' lot for 65 cents on the payed-out dollar, those are the odds at my…