[dead]
[flagged]
Flagged because: > what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."
Killing robots made by slaves. Where do I sign up?
What do you suggest? Some kind of std::const_reference<Type>? Clang-tidy is enough in addition to the reviews.
It's perverse and disgusting. Also what about lazy students, neurodivergent, or poor people that are most likely not having a good outcome despite learning? In the end even average students would be ignored by the…
I had the same reaction. It's a big stretch to call a "tool" 500 lines of JS that could be replaced with a few Bash calls, a regexp, or a small self-contained Python+UV script. Even worse when it's limited in…
Or yours...
They remove your privacy to make you think that your not worthy and that there is this pyramid. It worked! I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.
> deep understanding It took me less than one day to switch from git.
IIRC it's push force with lease, ie non destructive push force. No one will be bothered or notice what you did. And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
> AI-enabled <something> 1. Scrum-enabled 2. Blockchain enabled 3. Web3 enabled 4. AI-enabled
You created an AI-generated coloring book. Is it a way to farm karma?
What's your astrological sign?
> three personas for software engineers The kind of psycho-bullshit that we should stay away from, and wouldn't happen if we respected each other. Coming from Microsoft is not surprising though.
AI + subscription + tool that can be replaced with a simple notebook: spam. Also, what happened to https://contactconverter.app/? Were you bored already or wanted to scam more people with an AI application?
> the obvious problems can mostly be solved by having the agent try to compile the program The famous "It compiles on my machine." Is that where engineering is going? Spending $billions to get the same result as the…
You can't disagree with facts. Every time I try to give a chance to all those LLMs, they always use old APIs, APIs that don't exist, or mix things up. I'll still try that once a month to see how it evolves, but I have…
> Nowadays, it is better to write prompts Very big doubt. AI can help for a few very specific tasks, but the hallucinations still happen, and making things up (especially APIs) is unacceptable.
What's wrong with LibreOffice?
I don't care about LLMs being integrated everywhere. It's a stupid idea but we can't prevent it. As for the AI-bros full of FOMO, they are wrong as usual. IF it stays as it is, anyone will learn to use those tools in a…
Sandboxing should prevent most of those issues. We can't control the users giving permissions to everything, but with more control on those permissions, or disabled by default, a phone should stay pretty safe, or am I…
I also remember the early war between Androids and the iPhone. The main argument was that you don't need Google's permission to run applications.
If you're talking about LLMs, it's not self iterating at all, and actually chokes on its own vomit, and I don't see where its growth is exponential. > point in time at which technological growth becomes alien to humans,…
[dead]
[flagged]
Flagged because: > what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."
Killing robots made by slaves. Where do I sign up?
What do you suggest? Some kind of std::const_reference<Type>? Clang-tidy is enough in addition to the reviews.
It's perverse and disgusting. Also what about lazy students, neurodivergent, or poor people that are most likely not having a good outcome despite learning? In the end even average students would be ignored by the…
I had the same reaction. It's a big stretch to call a "tool" 500 lines of JS that could be replaced with a few Bash calls, a regexp, or a small self-contained Python+UV script. Even worse when it's limited in…
Or yours...
They remove your privacy to make you think that your not worthy and that there is this pyramid. It worked! I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.
> deep understanding It took me less than one day to switch from git.
IIRC it's push force with lease, ie non destructive push force. No one will be bothered or notice what you did. And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
> AI-enabled <something> 1. Scrum-enabled 2. Blockchain enabled 3. Web3 enabled 4. AI-enabled
You created an AI-generated coloring book. Is it a way to farm karma?
What's your astrological sign?
> three personas for software engineers The kind of psycho-bullshit that we should stay away from, and wouldn't happen if we respected each other. Coming from Microsoft is not surprising though.
AI + subscription + tool that can be replaced with a simple notebook: spam. Also, what happened to https://contactconverter.app/? Were you bored already or wanted to scam more people with an AI application?
> the obvious problems can mostly be solved by having the agent try to compile the program The famous "It compiles on my machine." Is that where engineering is going? Spending $billions to get the same result as the…
You can't disagree with facts. Every time I try to give a chance to all those LLMs, they always use old APIs, APIs that don't exist, or mix things up. I'll still try that once a month to see how it evolves, but I have…
> Nowadays, it is better to write prompts Very big doubt. AI can help for a few very specific tasks, but the hallucinations still happen, and making things up (especially APIs) is unacceptable.
What's wrong with LibreOffice?
I don't care about LLMs being integrated everywhere. It's a stupid idea but we can't prevent it. As for the AI-bros full of FOMO, they are wrong as usual. IF it stays as it is, anyone will learn to use those tools in a…
Sandboxing should prevent most of those issues. We can't control the users giving permissions to everything, but with more control on those permissions, or disabled by default, a phone should stay pretty safe, or am I…
I also remember the early war between Androids and the iPhone. The main argument was that you don't need Google's permission to run applications.
If you're talking about LLMs, it's not self iterating at all, and actually chokes on its own vomit, and I don't see where its growth is exponential. > point in time at which technological growth becomes alien to humans,…