[dead]
[flagged]
Flagged because: > what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."
Killing robots made by slaves. Where do I sign up?
What do you suggest? Some kind of std::const_reference<Type>? Clang-tidy is enough in addition to the reviews.
It's perverse and disgusting. Also what about lazy students, neurodivergent, or poor people that are most likely not having a good outcome despite learning? In the end even average students would be ignored by the…
He's even more wrong when the Python typing system allows us to catch bugs in small scripts.
Like obfuscating text on Twitter, GitHub gists, or using an unreliable E2E encrypted service? > without creating accounts or relying on any platform to keep it safe You're still restricted to places where your JS…
I had the same reaction. It's a big stretch to call a "tool" 500 lines of JS that could be replaced with a few Bash calls, a regexp, or a small self-contained Python+UV script. Even worse when it's limited in…
Or yours...
They remove your privacy to make you think that your not worthy and that there is this pyramid. It worked! I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.
Will the LLM take responsibility for the bugs and bad code introduced by the review? If it does and I'm free, then go for it.
> deep understanding It took me less than one day to switch from git.
> Since jj doesn't have names branches False. You need to call `jj branch set -r@ XYX` manually which can be a PITA but you only need to do that once you push. Or there is `jj git push --named XYZ=@` which moves the…
IIRC it's push force with lease, ie non destructive push force. No one will be bothered or notice what you did. And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
> AI-enabled <something> 1. Scrum-enabled 2. Blockchain enabled 3. Web3 enabled 4. AI-enabled
You created an AI-generated coloring book. Is it a way to farm karma?
You didn't answer OP's questions. It's not authentication at all.
What's your astrological sign?
> three personas for software engineers The kind of psycho-bullshit that we should stay away from, and wouldn't happen if we respected each other. Coming from Microsoft is not surprising though.
AI + subscription + tool that can be replaced with a simple notebook: spam. Also, what happened to https://contactconverter.app/? Were you bored already or wanted to scam more people with an AI application?
> the obvious problems can mostly be solved by having the agent try to compile the program The famous "It compiles on my machine." Is that where engineering is going? Spending $billions to get the same result as the…
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
Flagged because: > what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."
Killing robots made by slaves. Where do I sign up?
What do you suggest? Some kind of std::const_reference<Type>? Clang-tidy is enough in addition to the reviews.
It's perverse and disgusting. Also what about lazy students, neurodivergent, or poor people that are most likely not having a good outcome despite learning? In the end even average students would be ignored by the…
He's even more wrong when the Python typing system allows us to catch bugs in small scripts.
Like obfuscating text on Twitter, GitHub gists, or using an unreliable E2E encrypted service? > without creating accounts or relying on any platform to keep it safe You're still restricted to places where your JS…
I had the same reaction. It's a big stretch to call a "tool" 500 lines of JS that could be replaced with a few Bash calls, a regexp, or a small self-contained Python+UV script. Even worse when it's limited in…
Or yours...
They remove your privacy to make you think that your not worthy and that there is this pyramid. It worked! I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.
Will the LLM take responsibility for the bugs and bad code introduced by the review? If it does and I'm free, then go for it.
> deep understanding It took me less than one day to switch from git.
> Since jj doesn't have names branches False. You need to call `jj branch set -r@ XYX` manually which can be a PITA but you only need to do that once you push. Or there is `jj git push --named XYZ=@` which moves the…
IIRC it's push force with lease, ie non destructive push force. No one will be bothered or notice what you did. And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.
It's called "reviewing code." I'm not taking any kind of responsibility for code that I haven't written myself.
> AI-enabled <something> 1. Scrum-enabled 2. Blockchain enabled 3. Web3 enabled 4. AI-enabled
You created an AI-generated coloring book. Is it a way to farm karma?
You didn't answer OP's questions. It's not authentication at all.
What's your astrological sign?
> three personas for software engineers The kind of psycho-bullshit that we should stay away from, and wouldn't happen if we respected each other. Coming from Microsoft is not surprising though.
AI + subscription + tool that can be replaced with a simple notebook: spam. Also, what happened to https://contactconverter.app/? Were you bored already or wanted to scam more people with an AI application?
> the obvious problems can mostly be solved by having the agent try to compile the program The famous "It compiles on my machine." Is that where engineering is going? Spending $billions to get the same result as the…