Not sure if this is a real question but yes, I think Microsoft is too big to fail.
Like I said, loyalty test.
It's more or less a loyalty test. Are you going to use the correct term, or Trump's term. Which side are you on?
Maybe in the long run but right now their stock is tanking.
I think the myth of Elon's genius has been utterly shattered by the Path of Exile 2 debacle. Turns out faking it until you make it can take you all the way to the top.
The main advantages are the lack of bots (for now) and the lack of the paid blue checks. The former is a major improvement because it improves the overall quality of the tweets.
I'm kind of shocked by this comment. Microsoft seems to be dominating the industry, with copilot having over 1.5 million users.
If the presser is correct (and I am extremely skeptical), then the $7.5B cost would be trivial - even if it had to be done annually.
Have these numbers been verified by a neutral 3rd party? They seem awfully optimistic.
I must admit it is rather comfortable to have an accurate view of the world. It's much more profitable than being enmeshed in a bunch of conspiracy theories.
A fad that set back the industry by a decade.
This article is profoundly unhelpful for people who's job is to determine what speech is promoted and what speech isn't.
The facts of that case are radically different from Musk's accusations.
It basically endorses homeopathy which has been thoroughly debunked by evidence based medicine. Nothing it says is incorrect from a rigorous reading, but relying on a rigorous reading of your propaganda is no defense…
"I wish we had free speech online, except for people who try to cancel me".
Complaining about someone censoring your own opinions is not anti-censorship.
That's bait.
> Don't really like this framing of the problem - he owns a majority of voting shares, and he paid (or, rather, overpaid) mightily for that right. You can't really be "fired" from being an owner. This is basically what…
I don't know about Digg or Geocities. It might go the way of cosmo.com though. By this I mean it might get taken down because it's an unprofitable privately held business with no clear path to profitability. If it wants…
Ashley St Claire and Benny Johnson both got fired from center-right organisations (TPUSA and the Independent Journal Review respectivly) for being too extreme. That's literally the definition of "Far right". Ian Miles…
Might want to read up on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
Good journalism is not taking powerful peoples' word for things when there is considerable evidence to the contrary. If you want to believe Dabiri that's fine, but nothing in the article was factually incorrect and…
This is the opposite of dangerous. This is, dare I say, good reporting. Twitter had a very public technical glitch and the next day the head of engineering resigns, there is an obvious connection that can be drawn. If…
Everyone is trying too hard nowadays. It's one of the downsides of the internet. If you say "Rock and roll sin't as popular as it used to be" nobody will read your article. If you say "Rock is dead!" you'll get hits. I…
How is that in any way interesting? You conspiracy nuts will draw connections anywhere.
Not sure if this is a real question but yes, I think Microsoft is too big to fail.
Like I said, loyalty test.
It's more or less a loyalty test. Are you going to use the correct term, or Trump's term. Which side are you on?
Maybe in the long run but right now their stock is tanking.
I think the myth of Elon's genius has been utterly shattered by the Path of Exile 2 debacle. Turns out faking it until you make it can take you all the way to the top.
The main advantages are the lack of bots (for now) and the lack of the paid blue checks. The former is a major improvement because it improves the overall quality of the tweets.
I'm kind of shocked by this comment. Microsoft seems to be dominating the industry, with copilot having over 1.5 million users.
If the presser is correct (and I am extremely skeptical), then the $7.5B cost would be trivial - even if it had to be done annually.
Have these numbers been verified by a neutral 3rd party? They seem awfully optimistic.
I must admit it is rather comfortable to have an accurate view of the world. It's much more profitable than being enmeshed in a bunch of conspiracy theories.
A fad that set back the industry by a decade.
This article is profoundly unhelpful for people who's job is to determine what speech is promoted and what speech isn't.
The facts of that case are radically different from Musk's accusations.
It basically endorses homeopathy which has been thoroughly debunked by evidence based medicine. Nothing it says is incorrect from a rigorous reading, but relying on a rigorous reading of your propaganda is no defense…
"I wish we had free speech online, except for people who try to cancel me".
Complaining about someone censoring your own opinions is not anti-censorship.
That's bait.
> Don't really like this framing of the problem - he owns a majority of voting shares, and he paid (or, rather, overpaid) mightily for that right. You can't really be "fired" from being an owner. This is basically what…
I don't know about Digg or Geocities. It might go the way of cosmo.com though. By this I mean it might get taken down because it's an unprofitable privately held business with no clear path to profitability. If it wants…
Ashley St Claire and Benny Johnson both got fired from center-right organisations (TPUSA and the Independent Journal Review respectivly) for being too extreme. That's literally the definition of "Far right". Ian Miles…
Might want to read up on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
Good journalism is not taking powerful peoples' word for things when there is considerable evidence to the contrary. If you want to believe Dabiri that's fine, but nothing in the article was factually incorrect and…
This is the opposite of dangerous. This is, dare I say, good reporting. Twitter had a very public technical glitch and the next day the head of engineering resigns, there is an obvious connection that can be drawn. If…
Everyone is trying too hard nowadays. It's one of the downsides of the internet. If you say "Rock and roll sin't as popular as it used to be" nobody will read your article. If you say "Rock is dead!" you'll get hits. I…
How is that in any way interesting? You conspiracy nuts will draw connections anywhere.