>"some" Where?? That image looks unrelated to any men on the Moon. >somehow they would not know how to add stars with Photoshop to said images is beyond inane That level of detail would take huge computational power and…
> *It wasn't something that needed much proving in the first place Why don't you question what you read? Humans flying to the moon seems pretty extraordinary, no?
Soooooo beautiful!!!!!!!..... http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&gws_rd=cr&q=night+sky+... You'd think that with our history so closely connected with the stars (before urbanization limited your camera's view),…
I understood what he said. I'm simply asking for evidence. What proved it for you?
The stars are our map. With them we can find our way when we get lost. Every night they shine down on us and guide our direction. How can you excuse not a single orientable picture?
So the evidence that proved it to you was the magnitude of the achievement?
>"some" Where?? That image looks unrelated to any men on the Moon. >somehow they would not know how to add stars with Photoshop to said images is beyond inane That level of detail would take huge computational power and…
> *It wasn't something that needed much proving in the first place Why don't you question what you read? Humans flying to the moon seems pretty extraordinary, no?
Soooooo beautiful!!!!!!!..... http://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&gws_rd=cr&q=night+sky+... You'd think that with our history so closely connected with the stars (before urbanization limited your camera's view),…
I understood what he said. I'm simply asking for evidence. What proved it for you?
The stars are our map. With them we can find our way when we get lost. Every night they shine down on us and guide our direction. How can you excuse not a single orientable picture?
So the evidence that proved it to you was the magnitude of the achievement?