How do we know it wasn't already an antique when the ship sank?
It needs very unreasonable amount of scrolling.
Skin is vital, as you need to deage veins.
Yeah, it would make more sense to send several telescopes, each a bit better than the one before, but I guess it was easier to get funding for "this revolutionary telescope" than for "this would be like Hubble but a bit…
It's about what kind of competence is favored by the market - it favors people who can get funding, which is not necessarily related to the ability to get the job done.
No I'm not doing that, there seems to be some problem specifically there. Either the values are converted incorrectly, or not at all, effectivelly stretching about 8 fstops into the 11.6 (slightly less for video)…
No. It isn't there so that you can use it when you choose to. All devices expect it to be used. When you skip it the colors will be wrong.
It is different because it is obvious that shadows are darker than in reality while highlights are much brighter than in reality. Any brain filtering would have to affect the photos as well, even if it was true. No…
It seems to me there must be some kind of error in color calibration of most cameras. They make shadows much darker than they are, and bright areas much brighter than they are. It's not from a lack of dynamic range.
I get that, but it matters very little in a typical sentence. I bet you could understand almost everything with all vowels replaced with schwas.
I'm not a native speaker, but, I think it's rather the opposite. It's very inauthentic. English is a rather unusual language that the meaning is mostly carried only by consonants, while vowels are almost meaningless.…
They didn't: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Homicide_Rate_in_N... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/01/14/national/crime-...
Maybe the tougher sentences worked? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/...
Really? It looks like the complete opposite happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/me...
The problem is that it isn't better. No amount of sweet PR talk, neither any far fetched calcualtion is going to change the very obvious fact it's something that should never be used in practice. It's less reliable, has…
Also don't miss that one DAB multiplex takes the space of about 10 FM stations.
Digital doesn't imply good. It isn't better than MP3, it's typically 80kbps or less. 48 is not uncommon. It's no better than AM, it's only made sound superficially good with fake high frequencies and often fake stereo.…
Yes, you can do that, but the sound quality is very poor.
Absolutely not. While FM has a bit lower bandwith than healthy ears, digital adds fake high frequencies. There is just no way to cram enough data in the same signal to make digital any better.
That's an observation. Schrodinger cat isn't both dead and alive. Nothing happens in the box while it's closed. Really think about how this is an elegant solution that makes it completely un-paradoxical, excluding that…
Contrary to what used to be hammered into people, it must be observed by the observer, that is, by you. Any random interaction will not trigger the collapse. An interaction must itself be observed by the observer,…
Almost nobody does. There is just no advantage in switching to digital radio, and most likely there never be.
There is a guy, Viktor Kozeny, who is known for some hard to understand scam, and, I think he's a guy just like that, who through some horrible mistake ended up having actual responsibility, and screwed up so completely…
How do we know it wasn't already an antique when the ship sank?
It needs very unreasonable amount of scrolling.
Skin is vital, as you need to deage veins.
Yeah, it would make more sense to send several telescopes, each a bit better than the one before, but I guess it was easier to get funding for "this revolutionary telescope" than for "this would be like Hubble but a bit…
It's about what kind of competence is favored by the market - it favors people who can get funding, which is not necessarily related to the ability to get the job done.
No I'm not doing that, there seems to be some problem specifically there. Either the values are converted incorrectly, or not at all, effectivelly stretching about 8 fstops into the 11.6 (slightly less for video)…
No. It isn't there so that you can use it when you choose to. All devices expect it to be used. When you skip it the colors will be wrong.
It is different because it is obvious that shadows are darker than in reality while highlights are much brighter than in reality. Any brain filtering would have to affect the photos as well, even if it was true. No…
It seems to me there must be some kind of error in color calibration of most cameras. They make shadows much darker than they are, and bright areas much brighter than they are. It's not from a lack of dynamic range.
I get that, but it matters very little in a typical sentence. I bet you could understand almost everything with all vowels replaced with schwas.
I'm not a native speaker, but, I think it's rather the opposite. It's very inauthentic. English is a rather unusual language that the meaning is mostly carried only by consonants, while vowels are almost meaningless.…
They didn't: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Homicide_Rate_in_N... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/01/14/national/crime-...
Maybe the tougher sentences worked? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/...
Really? It looks like the complete opposite happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/me...
The problem is that it isn't better. No amount of sweet PR talk, neither any far fetched calcualtion is going to change the very obvious fact it's something that should never be used in practice. It's less reliable, has…
Also don't miss that one DAB multiplex takes the space of about 10 FM stations.
Digital doesn't imply good. It isn't better than MP3, it's typically 80kbps or less. 48 is not uncommon. It's no better than AM, it's only made sound superficially good with fake high frequencies and often fake stereo.…
Yes, you can do that, but the sound quality is very poor.
Absolutely not. While FM has a bit lower bandwith than healthy ears, digital adds fake high frequencies. There is just no way to cram enough data in the same signal to make digital any better.
That's an observation. Schrodinger cat isn't both dead and alive. Nothing happens in the box while it's closed. Really think about how this is an elegant solution that makes it completely un-paradoxical, excluding that…
Contrary to what used to be hammered into people, it must be observed by the observer, that is, by you. Any random interaction will not trigger the collapse. An interaction must itself be observed by the observer,…
Almost nobody does. There is just no advantage in switching to digital radio, and most likely there never be.
There is a guy, Viktor Kozeny, who is known for some hard to understand scam, and, I think he's a guy just like that, who through some horrible mistake ended up having actual responsibility, and screwed up so completely…