How do we know it wasn't already an antique when the ship sank?
It needs very unreasonable amount of scrolling.
Skin is vital, as you need to deage veins.
Yeah, it would make more sense to send several telescopes, each a bit better than the one before, but I guess it was easier to get funding for "this revolutionary telescope" than for "this would be like Hubble but a bit…
It's about what kind of competence is favored by the market - it favors people who can get funding, which is not necessarily related to the ability to get the job done.
No I'm not doing that, there seems to be some problem specifically there. Either the values are converted incorrectly, or not at all, effectivelly stretching about 8 fstops into the 11.6 (slightly less for video)…
No that can't be what's happening. You would expect contrast to be lost, not increased, if that was the issue. 8bit sRGB can contain 11.6 f-stops of dynamic range, and it is no longer enough for modern screens. There…
No. It isn't there so that you can use it when you choose to. All devices expect it to be used. When you skip it the colors will be wrong.
No, the problem is VERY OBVIOUSLY more severe than that. It's really as if the images were treated as linear, which they are not. (they use gamma correction)
The one I was replying to talked about brain processing. Whatever it is doesn't need to and shouldn't be reproduced in photography as the protograph gets processed just like everything else when you look at it. Reality…
No, that does not make any sense. That should result in 40, and everything darker resulting in 40, while 60 and everything brighter resulting in 60. But what you can see is that 40 results in 0, and 60 resulting in 100.…
It is different because it is obvious that shadows are darker than in reality while highlights are much brighter than in reality. Any brain filtering would have to affect the photos as well, even if it was true. No…
It seems to me there must be some kind of error in color calibration of most cameras. They make shadows much darker than they are, and bright areas much brighter than they are. It's not from a lack of dynamic range.
Different accents use different vowels, but they remain comprehensible. It's specifically those accents that also change consonants that are taken as hard to understand, such as Scouse.
I get that, but it matters very little in a typical sentence. I bet you could understand almost everything with all vowels replaced with schwas.
I'm not a native speaker, but, I think it's rather the opposite. It's very inauthentic. English is a rather unusual language that the meaning is mostly carried only by consonants, while vowels are almost meaningless.…
Yes it is cherry picking. You picked the starting date to make it seem like there was a dramatic rise, while looking further shows a post war dip, and return to "normal". I argued first with the incarceration, which…
But why do you need to cherry pick the data, if it's so clear cut? https://www.econlib.org/archives/2011/06/crime_statistic.htm...
The problem is there is no evidence for any crime boom unless you pick the right location and the right beginning year (typically the post war years) or some such contrieved scenario. Even the graph in your second link…
But there is no decline.
They didn't: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Homicide_Rate_in_N... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/01/14/national/crime-...
Maybe the tougher sentences worked? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/...
Really? It looks like the complete opposite happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/me...
Yes. It's too bad that politicians got corrupted as usual. Not in all countries though, many have shut it down.
No. In terms it's worse as it's worse. It ends up forgotten once the last patents expire and there is no value to salvage anymore. It's nothing but sunk cost fallacy that should have been stopped back in the 90s before…
How do we know it wasn't already an antique when the ship sank?
It needs very unreasonable amount of scrolling.
Skin is vital, as you need to deage veins.
Yeah, it would make more sense to send several telescopes, each a bit better than the one before, but I guess it was easier to get funding for "this revolutionary telescope" than for "this would be like Hubble but a bit…
It's about what kind of competence is favored by the market - it favors people who can get funding, which is not necessarily related to the ability to get the job done.
No I'm not doing that, there seems to be some problem specifically there. Either the values are converted incorrectly, or not at all, effectivelly stretching about 8 fstops into the 11.6 (slightly less for video)…
No that can't be what's happening. You would expect contrast to be lost, not increased, if that was the issue. 8bit sRGB can contain 11.6 f-stops of dynamic range, and it is no longer enough for modern screens. There…
No. It isn't there so that you can use it when you choose to. All devices expect it to be used. When you skip it the colors will be wrong.
No, the problem is VERY OBVIOUSLY more severe than that. It's really as if the images were treated as linear, which they are not. (they use gamma correction)
The one I was replying to talked about brain processing. Whatever it is doesn't need to and shouldn't be reproduced in photography as the protograph gets processed just like everything else when you look at it. Reality…
No, that does not make any sense. That should result in 40, and everything darker resulting in 40, while 60 and everything brighter resulting in 60. But what you can see is that 40 results in 0, and 60 resulting in 100.…
It is different because it is obvious that shadows are darker than in reality while highlights are much brighter than in reality. Any brain filtering would have to affect the photos as well, even if it was true. No…
It seems to me there must be some kind of error in color calibration of most cameras. They make shadows much darker than they are, and bright areas much brighter than they are. It's not from a lack of dynamic range.
Different accents use different vowels, but they remain comprehensible. It's specifically those accents that also change consonants that are taken as hard to understand, such as Scouse.
I get that, but it matters very little in a typical sentence. I bet you could understand almost everything with all vowels replaced with schwas.
I'm not a native speaker, but, I think it's rather the opposite. It's very inauthentic. English is a rather unusual language that the meaning is mostly carried only by consonants, while vowels are almost meaningless.…
Yes it is cherry picking. You picked the starting date to make it seem like there was a dramatic rise, while looking further shows a post war dip, and return to "normal". I argued first with the incarceration, which…
But why do you need to cherry pick the data, if it's so clear cut? https://www.econlib.org/archives/2011/06/crime_statistic.htm...
The problem is there is no evidence for any crime boom unless you pick the right location and the right beginning year (typically the post war years) or some such contrieved scenario. Even the graph in your second link…
But there is no decline.
They didn't: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Homicide_Rate_in_N... https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/01/14/national/crime-...
Maybe the tougher sentences worked? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/...
Really? It looks like the complete opposite happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States#/me...
Yes. It's too bad that politicians got corrupted as usual. Not in all countries though, many have shut it down.
No. In terms it's worse as it's worse. It ends up forgotten once the last patents expire and there is no value to salvage anymore. It's nothing but sunk cost fallacy that should have been stopped back in the 90s before…