Have you considered the possibility that your definition of normalcy is not equivalent to what's technically possible, or may be even the truth?
> Yes, because of people like you, Geoff. I don't see why you have to attack the author here, but let me ask you this -- if I "feel" unwelcomed by your conduct, for whatever reason, on a "private" mailing list, then…
Thanks a lot for writing this post, and for sharing it. > By satisfying the mob today, we are sacrificing our future. That’s the real risk. Precisely.
I have attended his talks, listened to podcasts and read some of his conversations on mailing lists. I can see why people may not like him, or the way he talks. But we disagree with people all the time. I would be…
I honestly would love to offer him a room, but I'm nowhere near Boston. This guy is a FLOSS hero -- his thoughts and opinions beyond FLOSS do not matter to me.
Have you considered the possibility that your definition of normalcy is not equivalent to what's technically possible, or may be even the truth?
> Yes, because of people like you, Geoff. I don't see why you have to attack the author here, but let me ask you this -- if I "feel" unwelcomed by your conduct, for whatever reason, on a "private" mailing list, then…
Thanks a lot for writing this post, and for sharing it. > By satisfying the mob today, we are sacrificing our future. That’s the real risk. Precisely.
I have attended his talks, listened to podcasts and read some of his conversations on mailing lists. I can see why people may not like him, or the way he talks. But we disagree with people all the time. I would be…
I honestly would love to offer him a room, but I'm nowhere near Boston. This guy is a FLOSS hero -- his thoughts and opinions beyond FLOSS do not matter to me.