No magic at play here. The equations are open for all to explore. We are not breaking the laws of physics. Just flexing them with clever engineering.. just like innovators that came before us. For example, the radiating…
You are correct. There's no magic at work here. We don't break the laws of physics, we just flex them with clever engineering... like most innovators that came before us.
You are right of course. Point taken. Thanks :)
The equations governing diffraction are relatively straight forward. We are operating within the near-field (or more accurately in the Frensel range). I'm sure you can do the math and see how focusing a phased array can…
Great question! in fact... so good that I cant answer it properly without divulging some of the secret source. Suffice to say that you are on to some of our more interesting IP ;)
No. we are beaming strictly point-to-point in the near field unlike WiFi, Bluetooth, RFIF, etc Unless of course we are beaming directly at a coms antenna, which we don't plan to :)
:)) no magic, just solid engineering. There will always be sidle-lobes. The question is how much and what do you do with it.
We use coherent beaming. The interval between relays largely depends on topographical, regulatory, and environmental conditions. In any case, all our systems are designed to be absolutely safe for any organic life form.…
Theoretically any distance is possible. Practically, we are limited by antenna size considerations. For example, we are currently looking at powering an island across a distance of 30km with an end-to-end efficiency of…
Rain has negligible affect on EM propagation in the frequencies we are operating in. See: http://gsp.humboldt.edu/OLM/Courses/GSP_216_Online/lesson2-1...
What are you basing your statement on? have you actually done the math?
End to end efficiency is absolutely critical for making any wireless power endeavour viable. Beyond delivery loss, don't forget that there are other CAPEX/OPEX considerations. For example, an underwater cable from an…
Hi, not sure how you came to the conclusion that "still require local storage or generation resources at the receiving end". the whole point is replacing those with a steady connection to the national grid. the only…
Typically 2.4 - 5.8GHz
Its in the article. ISM band. typically 2.4-5.8GHz. there are a number of safety measures. some based on a feedback loop, laser safety screen and others. cant go over all those details in a gimmicky article :))
relays are passive and require no power. quasi-optics.
This is NOT "incredibly dangerous". This is the sort of lazy internet commenting that doesn’t rely on actual research. There will always going to be sceptics. All we can do is rely on solid science and engineering and…
Reporters sometimes tend to pretend they are novelist and get many details wrong (to put it mildly) 70% efficiency is the current state of the art limit for solid state based Tx. we loose close to 0% in the atmosphere…
A number of studies have been done over the years exploring wind, solar and other alternatives. Unfortunately, they aren't perfect. non, including the two turbine solution, comes even close to providing the energy…
Using 2.4GHz-5.5GHz means minimal (if any) weather related interference. Rain wont have any effect...unless its heavy enough to bring down the antennas. but thats going to be an issue for any outdoors structure such as…
As you rightly noted, an article wont go into those details :). you are rising a valid point which we have addressed. Happy to explain if you PM me
The antenna size is governed by the wavelength and the distance between Tx and Rx (or relays). There are no sidelobes. We are using near-field and catching close to 100% of the radiated energy. Range is only limited by…
No sideloabs. we are using near-field
You are spot on. this is one of the best use cases for Emrod tech
Guys, This is Greg Kushnir, founder of Emrod. I am excited and humbled by your support. At Emrod we have safety and environmental considerations at the core. I’m happy to explain why our tech is not only safe but also…
No magic at play here. The equations are open for all to explore. We are not breaking the laws of physics. Just flexing them with clever engineering.. just like innovators that came before us. For example, the radiating…
You are correct. There's no magic at work here. We don't break the laws of physics, we just flex them with clever engineering... like most innovators that came before us.
You are right of course. Point taken. Thanks :)
The equations governing diffraction are relatively straight forward. We are operating within the near-field (or more accurately in the Frensel range). I'm sure you can do the math and see how focusing a phased array can…
Great question! in fact... so good that I cant answer it properly without divulging some of the secret source. Suffice to say that you are on to some of our more interesting IP ;)
No. we are beaming strictly point-to-point in the near field unlike WiFi, Bluetooth, RFIF, etc Unless of course we are beaming directly at a coms antenna, which we don't plan to :)
:)) no magic, just solid engineering. There will always be sidle-lobes. The question is how much and what do you do with it.
We use coherent beaming. The interval between relays largely depends on topographical, regulatory, and environmental conditions. In any case, all our systems are designed to be absolutely safe for any organic life form.…
Theoretically any distance is possible. Practically, we are limited by antenna size considerations. For example, we are currently looking at powering an island across a distance of 30km with an end-to-end efficiency of…
Rain has negligible affect on EM propagation in the frequencies we are operating in. See: http://gsp.humboldt.edu/OLM/Courses/GSP_216_Online/lesson2-1...
What are you basing your statement on? have you actually done the math?
End to end efficiency is absolutely critical for making any wireless power endeavour viable. Beyond delivery loss, don't forget that there are other CAPEX/OPEX considerations. For example, an underwater cable from an…
Hi, not sure how you came to the conclusion that "still require local storage or generation resources at the receiving end". the whole point is replacing those with a steady connection to the national grid. the only…
Typically 2.4 - 5.8GHz
Its in the article. ISM band. typically 2.4-5.8GHz. there are a number of safety measures. some based on a feedback loop, laser safety screen and others. cant go over all those details in a gimmicky article :))
relays are passive and require no power. quasi-optics.
This is NOT "incredibly dangerous". This is the sort of lazy internet commenting that doesn’t rely on actual research. There will always going to be sceptics. All we can do is rely on solid science and engineering and…
Reporters sometimes tend to pretend they are novelist and get many details wrong (to put it mildly) 70% efficiency is the current state of the art limit for solid state based Tx. we loose close to 0% in the atmosphere…
A number of studies have been done over the years exploring wind, solar and other alternatives. Unfortunately, they aren't perfect. non, including the two turbine solution, comes even close to providing the energy…
Using 2.4GHz-5.5GHz means minimal (if any) weather related interference. Rain wont have any effect...unless its heavy enough to bring down the antennas. but thats going to be an issue for any outdoors structure such as…
As you rightly noted, an article wont go into those details :). you are rising a valid point which we have addressed. Happy to explain if you PM me
The antenna size is governed by the wavelength and the distance between Tx and Rx (or relays). There are no sidelobes. We are using near-field and catching close to 100% of the radiated energy. Range is only limited by…
No sideloabs. we are using near-field
You are spot on. this is one of the best use cases for Emrod tech
Guys, This is Greg Kushnir, founder of Emrod. I am excited and humbled by your support. At Emrod we have safety and environmental considerations at the core. I’m happy to explain why our tech is not only safe but also…