If you're doing that as part of a business, yes. If you're doing it personally, no.
This is as ethical as it gets. They're getting compensated by being able to use the result of their work freely. This is the rising tide that lifts all boats.
That's not at all specific. What individual files and directories?
No, it's more healthy to start the conversation on why we allow corporations to do bad things with excuses like "just serving customer's needs"
People are humans. Natural people are people, and therefore humans. Humans have rights because we all want to live in a society where it's not OK to murder people without consequences. Corporations are pieces of paper…
You're trying to make sense of a broken worldview. Hopefully the absurdity is becoming clear. No, it's just a piece of paper. Yes, rights/laws/norms/etc are legal fiction. Harm is material. Without harm, there's not…
Which is why elsewhere I make the argument that we should strongly reject the terminology of "people" in any relation to corporations. It leads people down bad mental thought processes by sneaking in priors.…
I'm also focused on the broader principle, not just specifically any one structure such as LLCs. I have the legal right as a person to write on a piece of paper "i am a person". That piece of paper does not inherit any…
It's a dangerous game to anthropomorphize legal fictions by using terms like attributing "will" to them. Likewise by sneaking in priors with the term "people". It's best to stick to calling them legal fiction. It might…
You're confusing them again, which is why sneaking in priors with the term "people" is bad. "granted to them by the people" means "We The People", society, etc, not the people in control of the legal fiction. > being…
Corporations don't have the right of representation, because corporations don't have rights. People have rights, and corporations are not people.
They're not, and the terminology shouldn't be confused. "Juridical people" tries to sneak in priors about what "people" means. People, of course, have rights. Corporations are not people, including "juridical people".…
Because corporations aren't people. Full stop.
They can vote and act in their capacity as people. They can fuck off otherwise.
The contradiction clears up when you realize that corporations are legal fiction without rights, merely privileges granted to them. You can act in your capacity as a person and exercise your rights, taking on personal…
This is an impressively awful take, congratulations. Corporations aren't people and don't have rights or votes. If you want to have a say in the way a place is run, you can do so in your capacity as a person. If you…
If you want a say, live there.
The article doesn't say exactly what information. Is it something that technically maybe could possibly be considered under NDA? Or something more substantial? France said: > “Each country is free to regulate their…
That group can have the legal fiction of the corporation for liability reasons. They can also, separately, assemble as a group for political speech, each using their own rights as a person. That corporation is not a…
They can do so without the protections of a corporation. You can take actions qua you as a person, and assume the liability for those actions. Or you can shield yourself behind a legal fiction, but that is not a person.…
If that's one of the better criticisms of the book, that's a pretty good recommendation for the book. The article author clearly just doesn't like their dream being shattered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Miracle > This embrace of phonics education and the near-complete rejection of whole language theory was a key component of the program's success.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purge
Treating Catholics as "what Christians believe" is just as wrong. Pretribulational premillennialism is a popular position in mainstream Christianity in the US, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind_(novel)…
Christians are ok with that, because they think they'll have been raptured already.
If you're doing that as part of a business, yes. If you're doing it personally, no.
This is as ethical as it gets. They're getting compensated by being able to use the result of their work freely. This is the rising tide that lifts all boats.
That's not at all specific. What individual files and directories?
No, it's more healthy to start the conversation on why we allow corporations to do bad things with excuses like "just serving customer's needs"
People are humans. Natural people are people, and therefore humans. Humans have rights because we all want to live in a society where it's not OK to murder people without consequences. Corporations are pieces of paper…
You're trying to make sense of a broken worldview. Hopefully the absurdity is becoming clear. No, it's just a piece of paper. Yes, rights/laws/norms/etc are legal fiction. Harm is material. Without harm, there's not…
Which is why elsewhere I make the argument that we should strongly reject the terminology of "people" in any relation to corporations. It leads people down bad mental thought processes by sneaking in priors.…
I'm also focused on the broader principle, not just specifically any one structure such as LLCs. I have the legal right as a person to write on a piece of paper "i am a person". That piece of paper does not inherit any…
It's a dangerous game to anthropomorphize legal fictions by using terms like attributing "will" to them. Likewise by sneaking in priors with the term "people". It's best to stick to calling them legal fiction. It might…
You're confusing them again, which is why sneaking in priors with the term "people" is bad. "granted to them by the people" means "We The People", society, etc, not the people in control of the legal fiction. > being…
Corporations don't have the right of representation, because corporations don't have rights. People have rights, and corporations are not people.
They're not, and the terminology shouldn't be confused. "Juridical people" tries to sneak in priors about what "people" means. People, of course, have rights. Corporations are not people, including "juridical people".…
Because corporations aren't people. Full stop.
They can vote and act in their capacity as people. They can fuck off otherwise.
The contradiction clears up when you realize that corporations are legal fiction without rights, merely privileges granted to them. You can act in your capacity as a person and exercise your rights, taking on personal…
This is an impressively awful take, congratulations. Corporations aren't people and don't have rights or votes. If you want to have a say in the way a place is run, you can do so in your capacity as a person. If you…
If you want a say, live there.
The article doesn't say exactly what information. Is it something that technically maybe could possibly be considered under NDA? Or something more substantial? France said: > “Each country is free to regulate their…
That group can have the legal fiction of the corporation for liability reasons. They can also, separately, assemble as a group for political speech, each using their own rights as a person. That corporation is not a…
They can do so without the protections of a corporation. You can take actions qua you as a person, and assume the liability for those actions. Or you can shield yourself behind a legal fiction, but that is not a person.…
If that's one of the better criticisms of the book, that's a pretty good recommendation for the book. The article author clearly just doesn't like their dream being shattered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Miracle > This embrace of phonics education and the near-complete rejection of whole language theory was a key component of the program's success.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purge
Treating Catholics as "what Christians believe" is just as wrong. Pretribulational premillennialism is a popular position in mainstream Christianity in the US, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Behind_(novel)…
Christians are ok with that, because they think they'll have been raptured already.