There is a side-note to be had here. Shannon defines 'communication' as 'all the procedures by which one mind may affect another and then goes on to define the semantic problem ( How precisely do the transmitted symbols…
ban test Try again?
While you are tripping over semantics ponder on this: Is it 'getting faster' if 'much much faster' is faster than 'much faster'? I don't have much patience for linguistic prescriptivists. If you are 'correcting' other…
What do you expect to gain from somebody who already agrees with you, Mr Obvious? Having the last word was a really poor effort at conserving energy.
Seeming as you clicked the down-vote button and not the 'reply' button, I am going to just assume you don't know... Congratulations. You win the argument, and the internet. Pointing out the problems without offering…
You come across as somebody who doesn't have an answer to the actual hard question. Yes - it's faster now than 150 years ago. What should the rate of change be at? What should we be aiming for? Give me a bounded…
So you are talking about Calculus. 'Much faster' implies 2nd derivative. What rate of change is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
Which time-interval is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
There is a side-note to be had here. Shannon defines 'communication' as 'all the procedures by which one mind may affect another and then goes on to define the semantic problem ( How precisely do the transmitted symbols…
ban test Try again?
While you are tripping over semantics ponder on this: Is it 'getting faster' if 'much much faster' is faster than 'much faster'? I don't have much patience for linguistic prescriptivists. If you are 'correcting' other…
What do you expect to gain from somebody who already agrees with you, Mr Obvious? Having the last word was a really poor effort at conserving energy.
Seeming as you clicked the down-vote button and not the 'reply' button, I am going to just assume you don't know... Congratulations. You win the argument, and the internet. Pointing out the problems without offering…
You come across as somebody who doesn't have an answer to the actual hard question. Yes - it's faster now than 150 years ago. What should the rate of change be at? What should we be aiming for? Give me a bounded…
So you are talking about Calculus. 'Much faster' implies 2nd derivative. What rate of change is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
Which time-interval is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?