While you are tripping over semantics ponder on this: Is it 'getting faster' if 'much much faster' is faster than 'much faster'? I don't have much patience for linguistic prescriptivists. If you are 'correcting' other…
Seeming as you clicked the down-vote button and not the 'reply' button, I am going to just assume you don't know... Congratulations. You win the argument, and the internet. Pointing out the problems without offering…
You come across as somebody who doesn't have an answer to the actual hard question. Yes - it's faster now than 150 years ago. What should the rate of change be at? What should we be aiming for? Give me a bounded…
So you are talking about Calculus. 'Much faster' implies 2nd derivative. What rate of change is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
Which time-interval is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
While you are tripping over semantics ponder on this: Is it 'getting faster' if 'much much faster' is faster than 'much faster'? I don't have much patience for linguistic prescriptivists. If you are 'correcting' other…
Seeming as you clicked the down-vote button and not the 'reply' button, I am going to just assume you don't know... Congratulations. You win the argument, and the internet. Pointing out the problems without offering…
You come across as somebody who doesn't have an answer to the actual hard question. Yes - it's faster now than 150 years ago. What should the rate of change be at? What should we be aiming for? Give me a bounded…
So you are talking about Calculus. 'Much faster' implies 2nd derivative. What rate of change is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?
Which time-interval is your baseline for ‘objective normality’?