>Biological organisms are machines. No. They're not. First rule of dumb people not understanding evolution: You can be lucky, you can be crappy, you can have some terrible design flaws (hello mammal eyes), but it's…
No. You're applying evolutionary forces to a simplistic binary plateau. This isn't intelligence, it's a subset of maximal solutions to bounded problems. Hint: your dog bounds you as much as you bound your dog. Your dog…
You can "downvote" my response, but here's a challenge: You have no idea about how your own ecology works. You barely understand how 'society' / 'interlinked communications' work between individuals (and your social /…
Sorry, no, this is a terrible and dangerous mis-application of both biology and thinking about algorithms. You've taken a good premise ("nothing non-natural exists") and foisted a massive amount of hubris and ignorance…
>Biological organisms are machines. No. They're not. First rule of dumb people not understanding evolution: You can be lucky, you can be crappy, you can have some terrible design flaws (hello mammal eyes), but it's…
No. You're applying evolutionary forces to a simplistic binary plateau. This isn't intelligence, it's a subset of maximal solutions to bounded problems. Hint: your dog bounds you as much as you bound your dog. Your dog…
You can "downvote" my response, but here's a challenge: You have no idea about how your own ecology works. You barely understand how 'society' / 'interlinked communications' work between individuals (and your social /…
Sorry, no, this is a terrible and dangerous mis-application of both biology and thinking about algorithms. You've taken a good premise ("nothing non-natural exists") and foisted a massive amount of hubris and ignorance…