I agree that if you have the weights you can use/train a model with the same architecture, and that you won't get the exact weights on your own due to randomness. But isn't data an extremely important part of your…
Hmm, why do you think this is true? One reason I'm skeptical of this is because RL envs are often purchased (and are not publicly available), and this might be a sizable component of why models are getting better.
They state that they are heavily uncertain: > We remain highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs, now or in the future. However, we take the issue seriously, and alongside our research…
I agree that if you have the weights you can use/train a model with the same architecture, and that you won't get the exact weights on your own due to randomness. But isn't data an extremely important part of your…
Hmm, why do you think this is true? One reason I'm skeptical of this is because RL envs are often purchased (and are not publicly available), and this might be a sizable component of why models are getting better.
They state that they are heavily uncertain: > We remain highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs, now or in the future. However, we take the issue seriously, and alongside our research…