FourOnTheFloor
No user record in our sample, but FourOnTheFloor has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but FourOnTheFloor has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
[dead]
[flagged]
Thanks for answering his question.
OK, I will admit the "unexpected item" nonsense has diminished... only to be replaced by the "calling for assistance" out of nowhere.
"Unidentified item in driving area. Calling police."
And it almost always DOES go wrong. Seriously 75% of the time when I'm done scanning and I press "pay now," it inexplicably says "calling for assistance" and refuses to do anything until an employee comes over. WHY? And…
But this was an obvious sham and a fraud that couldn't scale. I don't think its demise is sad at all. What's sad is putting cashiers out of work, and even worse is replacing them with outrageously piss-poor…
Yep, that's pretty much it. Reminds me that one of the single biggest regressions in GUIs over the last couple of decades is: The knowledge of how to make a proper tabbed dialog has been lost to many.
Thanks. Never having seen a description in this language, I wouldn't know that the above syntax designated one; it looks like a comment. I also can't find any similar strings in any of the samples in the drop-down list.
Ha, true. They actually did have a way to invert the whole UI... but it also inverted photo images on the screen. poundAppleAttentionToDetail
Shitfest indeed. "back when you could configure stuff and have it not break early the following week" Exactly, but this was true on every GUI EXCEPT the vaunted Mac. For what, two decades, you could set up your own…
[flagged]
[flagged]
Thanks. I don't see any in that playground though. Which document are they in? I think I looked in all the ones in the drop-down.
How do they make it work on frequencies beyond its range? The diagram puts its range below the aviation band.
Hadn't heard of that, thanks. Does TypeSpec have description fields? I don't think I've seen any in the examples.
Cool, thanks for the reply!
Targeting OpenAPI 3.0 is a bad idea. It wasn't until 3.1 that it became truly useful, if only because it fixed one glaring blunder: Pre-3.1, you inexplicably couldn't provide a description along with a $ref. This…