> At some level we're tacitly acknowledging that the vast ocean of content and complexity we've created is beyond what is desirable or even healthy to effectively evaluate. I don't think there's enough useful and…
The existence of meatspace never stopped the early web from flourishing, so why should the existence of the modern web stop anybody from making a second web? The only reason that Google was useful is because it tapped…
15 years ago, I used to keep many tabs of youtube videos open just because the "related" section was full of interesting videos. Then each of those videos had interesting relations. There was so much to explore before…
Consolidation on narrow themes is ensured by our reliance on query->answer search engines. If you think about the shape of the web at the time Google introduced PageRank, It was a huge graph of content connected by…
Don't forget that development tools are also comically slow and bloated.
For the same reason you need a stack or a queue for depth/breadth first search. Open tabs represent yet to be completed work. It took work in the first place to open those tabs. If you close them you lose that work.
Content negotiation is "friendlier to humans" in the sense that you can serve the right content to different clients using the same URL, transparent to the user. If the URL itself is never meant to be shared by the…
I think this is essentially a false dichotomy. It's possible to experience the loss of both of those eras, as well as the current one whenever it passes. There's no inherent conflict in wanting them all back.
That's not a contradiction, is it? Selective engagement and non-engagement are different things. It's reasonable for some individuals to be generally less sociable than others. That doesn't mean it's OK to explicitly…
This is such a huge downside with subscription services in general. The product itself can change right under your nose and there's nothing you can do about it but cancel. First I was paying to filter out content, now…
But there's nothing meaningful in the video. He just keeps reiterating how he thinks you should feel about the situation. He clearly doesn't think it's worth his time to understand anything about LK-99, its history, or…
Two questions: 1. Whose role is it to make judgements about whether people should be able to find certain kinds of content? 2. Do you think modern recommendation systems are better at keeping people away from that kind…
The negatives being what? Technical? Social? Having a traversable landscape of content is incredibly valuable. I think "search results as search criteria"/"traversal by adjacency" is the only real feasible way to…
lemmy.world, for whatever reason, absolutely guzzles CPU cycles. I can't imagine what it could possibly need to do that requires executing that much javascript. It's all minimized, so it's hard to follow in the profiler.
I can't wait for them to bring back the old related videos list. When is the last time you've heard someone use the term "youtube rabbit hole"? The effect is so lost, people who never experienced it don't even use the…
If you used nothing but nails to build various styles of beds, you wouldn't have the same experience sleeping on them as the originals; Unless, of course, the original was a bed of nails. Sharp edges are just one…
>You have six hours to get your point across before the thread dies It used to take longer for a thread to die, but comments have always solidified rather quickly. This was fine, anyways, because each thread was an…
I absolutely want to read some of these. There needs to be a way to for people to post and rank the best matching articles that actually exist. I dream of the day that generative AI is repurposed to act as a more…
"Ask HN: I'm working full time on my blog and still have not found a sustainable way to make money"
> At some level we're tacitly acknowledging that the vast ocean of content and complexity we've created is beyond what is desirable or even healthy to effectively evaluate. I don't think there's enough useful and…
The existence of meatspace never stopped the early web from flourishing, so why should the existence of the modern web stop anybody from making a second web? The only reason that Google was useful is because it tapped…
15 years ago, I used to keep many tabs of youtube videos open just because the "related" section was full of interesting videos. Then each of those videos had interesting relations. There was so much to explore before…
Consolidation on narrow themes is ensured by our reliance on query->answer search engines. If you think about the shape of the web at the time Google introduced PageRank, It was a huge graph of content connected by…
Don't forget that development tools are also comically slow and bloated.
For the same reason you need a stack or a queue for depth/breadth first search. Open tabs represent yet to be completed work. It took work in the first place to open those tabs. If you close them you lose that work.
Content negotiation is "friendlier to humans" in the sense that you can serve the right content to different clients using the same URL, transparent to the user. If the URL itself is never meant to be shared by the…
I think this is essentially a false dichotomy. It's possible to experience the loss of both of those eras, as well as the current one whenever it passes. There's no inherent conflict in wanting them all back.
That's not a contradiction, is it? Selective engagement and non-engagement are different things. It's reasonable for some individuals to be generally less sociable than others. That doesn't mean it's OK to explicitly…
This is such a huge downside with subscription services in general. The product itself can change right under your nose and there's nothing you can do about it but cancel. First I was paying to filter out content, now…
But there's nothing meaningful in the video. He just keeps reiterating how he thinks you should feel about the situation. He clearly doesn't think it's worth his time to understand anything about LK-99, its history, or…
Two questions: 1. Whose role is it to make judgements about whether people should be able to find certain kinds of content? 2. Do you think modern recommendation systems are better at keeping people away from that kind…
The negatives being what? Technical? Social? Having a traversable landscape of content is incredibly valuable. I think "search results as search criteria"/"traversal by adjacency" is the only real feasible way to…
lemmy.world, for whatever reason, absolutely guzzles CPU cycles. I can't imagine what it could possibly need to do that requires executing that much javascript. It's all minimized, so it's hard to follow in the profiler.
I can't wait for them to bring back the old related videos list. When is the last time you've heard someone use the term "youtube rabbit hole"? The effect is so lost, people who never experienced it don't even use the…
If you used nothing but nails to build various styles of beds, you wouldn't have the same experience sleeping on them as the originals; Unless, of course, the original was a bed of nails. Sharp edges are just one…
>You have six hours to get your point across before the thread dies It used to take longer for a thread to die, but comments have always solidified rather quickly. This was fine, anyways, because each thread was an…
I absolutely want to read some of these. There needs to be a way to for people to post and rank the best matching articles that actually exist. I dream of the day that generative AI is repurposed to act as a more…
"Ask HN: I'm working full time on my blog and still have not found a sustainable way to make money"