FwarkALark
No user record in our sample, but FwarkALark has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but FwarkALark has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
[flagged]
Why is this exposed to the user? If it isn't exposed to the user, what on earth are you talking about?
Again, I don't see how a private industry per se could even possibly be worse given the demand for a profit margin. Your beef is with some other aspect of this process.
I mean, all industries? The profit margin guarantees this. Anyone who has worked in private industry will verify its utter incompetence in the long term.
Again, this can't be worse than private industry—that profit margin will guarantee this. I guarantee there is some other disease to blame for the waste—probably politicians of some sort invested in industry. Of course,…
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
> At what point should an acquisition be allowed on the sake of something being able to continue to exist and possibly save jobs? Never? The entire point of private companies is that they take risk on themselves. If we…
...for the client tooling, or for the service? The service is understandable but the tooling makes no sense whatsoever.
> If would likely take significant research effort to even figure out a way to incorporate the new discoveries into these engines. What? Have you ever used a solver before? The actual APIs exposed to the user are very…
> By "variable" I mean a name with a value attached. I'd just use "symbol" then. Symbols don't have much utility without a referent. > Forth doesn't let you define these within procedures. "within" vs "not within" seems…
I don't think anyone uses a stackless fortran.
[flagged]
> In ‘stack-based languages’ the stack is, most usually, an explicit semantic construct which acts as the only available value for procedures to act on. To the extent this is true, this is also true of all languages…
Ok sure, but FORTRAN still uses a stack in any of its relevant forms.
> But normal order evaluation with memoization (what human computer would do - write result only once) uses graphs and graph rewriting. ...which are still most simply implemented with a stack.
> Conceptually, I would say other languages are variable-based. This seems less meaningful than "syntax-based" . Certainly, a "variable" is not a fundamental I deal with on a daily basis in c-based languages—there are…
Nothing.
> In this case, ‘stack-based language’ is used as a term of art. This is a shitty and broken term. Hence my comment. > is a language which there’s a stack threaded through successive procedure calls, where access to the…
> This seems like a great introduction to stack-based languages! Do you know of a language which is not based on stacks?
Is there a language which is not stack-based? I imagine "concatenative" would be mildly more precise of a description. Coroutines (which often carry their own stacks) can sort-of dodge stacks—effectively utilizing a…
That's wonderful! Full endorsement of the support of rsync.net. I sincerely doubt most tools will be supported by most providers (by usage), however, and I question the evaluation of tools by this metric. Support is…
> What cloud storage provider officially supports this tool or the protocol used by it? Man I wish I lived in a universe where providers actually supported tooling. You're completely delusional tho.
> Rclone can also mount cloud storage to local disk It's not immediately apparent what this means—does it use FUSE, 9p, a driver, or some other mechanism to convert FS calls into API calls? EDIT: it's FUSE.