GPerson
No user record in our sample, but GPerson has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but GPerson has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
Is anthropic paying you guys for all this free advertising dang? This is pathetic.
It’s not. Novels are fiction by the way.
Anyone willing to put Ghibli themed AI slop on their page has nothing to share about truth, unless their truth is that management is fundamentally unethical.
That proof has almost no significance because the average mathematician cannot spend 2 million dollars on inference.
And it’s just a copy of notepad from windows xp.
You can try. What happens is it cheats you at every turn and finally admits it wasn’t testing anything when you ask why it’s still broken. Yes, this actually happens.
Rigorously designing and understanding the system does not sound like what you were referring to in the original post. All of my heroes always said the difficult part is not in the writing of the code, but in the…
The step you describe is the main use case I’ve found where vibe coding actually makes sense. Going from there to actually make a good version of the thing then becomes more hands on.
I’ve done a lot of vibe coding and I just can’t understand these takes. Pure vibe coding is not going to get you to a good result, so the alchemist you describe is still very much essential, and as far as I can see will…
I agree. Vibe coding eventually just becomes repetitively QA testing the work of a bad engineer.
“It's redundant to say "I think" at any point in an opinion piece.” “But is there still value in human produced writing? Subjectively, yes. Objectively? I'm not sure. I think there's a lot of personal value in writing…
I found this to be a disturbing read. Do not recommend.
It definitely has its amazing moments, but sometimes I get caught in a loop of expecting it to do the thing, it not working, and spinning my wheels a lot instead of just solving it myself. I think I’m still learning how…
So your stance is that it is impossible to create a simulated intelligence which is not conscious? That seems like the less likely possibility to me. I do think it’s clearly possible to manufacture a conscious mind.
The more I interact with these the less I’m afraid these tools will make life meaningless. (Can’t speak on art generation tools. Those still depress me.) It doesn’t matter what you’re making there are still a lot of…
So you’re not buying the idea that with increased productivity those tools will quickly follow?
Reddit is partially owned by Sam Altman and they have deals with llm companies to sell the data. The content has been and will continue to be grabbed by everyone who can pay.
This crowd would sooner believe silicon hardware (an arbitrary human invention from the 50s-60s) will have the physical properties required for consciousness than accept that they participate in torturing literally a…
My principled stance is that all known physical processes depend on particular physical processes and consciousness should be no different. What is yours?
Consciousness is a physical process and like all physical processes depends on particular material interactions.
I’m actually a vegan because I believe cows have consciousness. I believe consciousness is the only trait worth considering when applying morality questions. Arbitrary hardware is conscious.
[flagged]
Would it crash if AI advances in a way which makes massive compute unnecessary? That’s an interesting possibility I wonder about.
AGI will behave as if it were sentient but will not have consciousness. I believe in that to an equal amount that I believe solipsism is wrong. There is therefore no morality question in “enslaving” AGI. It doesn’t even…
Kinda curious on what jblow would say about this.