You've made about 20 comments on this thread and all of them demonstrate you haven't read a single word of the docket. Plaintiffs now have the Navy radar tapes and they show and object hitting the plane then spiraling…
And that explanation falls apart instantly when you consider the fact that the FBI was criticized by a neutral third party for removing some of the wreckage without any documentation.
> My understanding is that the chronology of all eyewitness accounts for the missile have been after the airframe was known to have broken up This statement is absurd on its face unless all the witnesses were…
> straw-clutching If that's how you characterize the plaintiff's recent acquisition of Navy radar tapes (previously seized by the FBI) that show a missile hitting the plane and then spiraling away I have to seriously…
> they were put in charge because it was a suspected terrorist attack. Good thing the US government doesn't have a long history of using terrorism as an excuse to expand its own power beyond all reasonable limits. Oh…
> overwhelming evidence Well yes, of course it would look overwhelming if all the contradictory evidence and testimony was buried. Not to mention any evidence they fabricated to support their cover-up. You're really…
> If the radar tapes still exist Read the lawsuit, they have the tapes.
The radar tapes show something impacting the plane and then "spiraling away", sounds like it could easily be a collision by a missile without a warhead. > For example, Dr. Stalcup obtained several FBI records never…
- Missile system being tested in the area - Dozens of witnesses who report seeing missiles in the weeks before and after the crash - Multiple witnesses including Blackhawk pilots flying nearby who saw a missile hit the…
> Here's the part of his conclusion relevant to this new development This quote isn't even remotely relevant to the new developments and it's extremely obvious you didn't even take 30 seconds to skim the docket. They've…
Have to disagree. I would say choosing the right collectibles is an acquired skill that takes a long time to develop and usually applies to a niche market, and that's why it seems like collectibles overall are a bad…
You've made about 20 comments on this thread and all of them demonstrate you haven't read a single word of the docket. Plaintiffs now have the Navy radar tapes and they show and object hitting the plane then spiraling…
And that explanation falls apart instantly when you consider the fact that the FBI was criticized by a neutral third party for removing some of the wreckage without any documentation.
> My understanding is that the chronology of all eyewitness accounts for the missile have been after the airframe was known to have broken up This statement is absurd on its face unless all the witnesses were…
> straw-clutching If that's how you characterize the plaintiff's recent acquisition of Navy radar tapes (previously seized by the FBI) that show a missile hitting the plane and then spiraling away I have to seriously…
> they were put in charge because it was a suspected terrorist attack. Good thing the US government doesn't have a long history of using terrorism as an excuse to expand its own power beyond all reasonable limits. Oh…
> overwhelming evidence Well yes, of course it would look overwhelming if all the contradictory evidence and testimony was buried. Not to mention any evidence they fabricated to support their cover-up. You're really…
> If the radar tapes still exist Read the lawsuit, they have the tapes.
The radar tapes show something impacting the plane and then "spiraling away", sounds like it could easily be a collision by a missile without a warhead. > For example, Dr. Stalcup obtained several FBI records never…
- Missile system being tested in the area - Dozens of witnesses who report seeing missiles in the weeks before and after the crash - Multiple witnesses including Blackhawk pilots flying nearby who saw a missile hit the…
> Here's the part of his conclusion relevant to this new development This quote isn't even remotely relevant to the new developments and it's extremely obvious you didn't even take 30 seconds to skim the docket. They've…
Have to disagree. I would say choosing the right collectibles is an acquired skill that takes a long time to develop and usually applies to a niche market, and that's why it seems like collectibles overall are a bad…