That's not the problem, the problem is electing politicians who immediately renege on their promises as soon as they're elected and don't represent the interests of the people who voted for them.
It always has been the case that some new labor skills emerge, but that only has to be wrong once. And given that how it's always worked is that the new skills used brainpower to make centaurs of people, to use Cory…
I see now why you say that, but I think he's coming from a different place than that.
I really hope you are right.
Maybe the economic system of just letting billionaires do anything they want to is not the one we should be using anymore.
People here are happy to downvote you, but I note that none of them have any kind of rebuttal for what you're saying.
They managed the external connection because they were being provided with one by outside nations trying to topple the government. They were promptly arrested and the "protests" fizzled out. Trump then bombed them…
Was that this one, by any chance? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50195562
Not at all.
"The only durable way achieve peace in the Mideast is the collapse of Israel and of its regional proxies" There, fixed it for you. No charge.
That's true: Obama bucked the trend. Overall, there were still many powerful interests in the US who despised Iran waiting to take power. I'd still call it just a matter of time.
Quite the contrary. It doesn't matter what Iran does: their crime is existing without being under the control of the US. The US installed a puppet regime in Iran in 1953, and had a powerful vassal in the middle east,…
Why be far from anti-US if this is what the US does?
Some of them might be trying to justify the things they do at their day jobs that make the world worse.
He doesn't just LOOK sociopathic...
It's not a coincidence. The song is called "The Simps on AI". They're definitely referencing Blinky.
Note that all of a sudden, the great majority of the comments on this page appear to be pro-US government and pretend that the CCP is somehow worse. Not a coincidence: the regulatory capture is starting right here.
"This is a new golden age for entrepreneurs and apocalypse for wage workers" "right now the future does seem bright" This reads like "Fuck you, I've got mine." Who cares about those wage workers anyway, right?
Kind of seems like the thing the mods should be on top of, doesn't it? Something getting flagged because users have a conflict of interest and a pro-corporate bias.
It might be, people have high expectations of this place.
My apologies if I was rude. But I still stand by my statement: this technology is unlike anything that came before it and the effects on the youth are mostly bad. We will probably have to agree to disagree: at least…
Good that you point that out: we don't really know what happened between him and his accountant.
Very bad analogy, and it looks like perhaps you don't understand this technology at all. Studies are showing that overusing it makes people stupid. Young people today are going to wind up completely unemployable.
That's not the point. The point is that that isn't how young people and college students are using it now: they are using it to think for them, and that's what's going to lead to the dip in human cognitive ability that…
They are a related technology, though, using transformers, some with quite similar architectures to LLMs.
That's not the problem, the problem is electing politicians who immediately renege on their promises as soon as they're elected and don't represent the interests of the people who voted for them.
It always has been the case that some new labor skills emerge, but that only has to be wrong once. And given that how it's always worked is that the new skills used brainpower to make centaurs of people, to use Cory…
I see now why you say that, but I think he's coming from a different place than that.
I really hope you are right.
Maybe the economic system of just letting billionaires do anything they want to is not the one we should be using anymore.
People here are happy to downvote you, but I note that none of them have any kind of rebuttal for what you're saying.
They managed the external connection because they were being provided with one by outside nations trying to topple the government. They were promptly arrested and the "protests" fizzled out. Trump then bombed them…
Was that this one, by any chance? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50195562
Not at all.
"The only durable way achieve peace in the Mideast is the collapse of Israel and of its regional proxies" There, fixed it for you. No charge.
That's true: Obama bucked the trend. Overall, there were still many powerful interests in the US who despised Iran waiting to take power. I'd still call it just a matter of time.
Quite the contrary. It doesn't matter what Iran does: their crime is existing without being under the control of the US. The US installed a puppet regime in Iran in 1953, and had a powerful vassal in the middle east,…
Why be far from anti-US if this is what the US does?
Some of them might be trying to justify the things they do at their day jobs that make the world worse.
He doesn't just LOOK sociopathic...
It's not a coincidence. The song is called "The Simps on AI". They're definitely referencing Blinky.
Note that all of a sudden, the great majority of the comments on this page appear to be pro-US government and pretend that the CCP is somehow worse. Not a coincidence: the regulatory capture is starting right here.
"This is a new golden age for entrepreneurs and apocalypse for wage workers" "right now the future does seem bright" This reads like "Fuck you, I've got mine." Who cares about those wage workers anyway, right?
Kind of seems like the thing the mods should be on top of, doesn't it? Something getting flagged because users have a conflict of interest and a pro-corporate bias.
It might be, people have high expectations of this place.
My apologies if I was rude. But I still stand by my statement: this technology is unlike anything that came before it and the effects on the youth are mostly bad. We will probably have to agree to disagree: at least…
Good that you point that out: we don't really know what happened between him and his accountant.
Very bad analogy, and it looks like perhaps you don't understand this technology at all. Studies are showing that overusing it makes people stupid. Young people today are going to wind up completely unemployable.
That's not the point. The point is that that isn't how young people and college students are using it now: they are using it to think for them, and that's what's going to lead to the dip in human cognitive ability that…
They are a related technology, though, using transformers, some with quite similar architectures to LLMs.