Can I submit a request somewhere to have my data removed?
Can users here submit an issue to have data associated with their account removed?
because the people driving these products are disconnected and deeply unbalanced people
Because the first couple major iterations looked like exponential improvements, and, because VC/private money is stupid, they assumed the trend must continue on the same curve. And because there's something in the human…
If you re--calibrate from any lofty idea of their motives to "get investor money now", this and other moves/announcements make more sense: anything that could look good to an investor. User count going up? Sure. New…
They would say that explicitly, that's the kind of marketing you can't buy.
Did you, the company who built and sold this SaaS product, offer and agree to provide the service your customers paid you for? Did your product fail to render those services? Or do damage to the customer by operating…
Exactly. I have said several times that the largest and most lucrative market for AI and agents in general is liability-laundering. It's just that you can't advertise that, or you ruin the service. And it already does…
It's not reasonable to claim inference is profitable when they've also never released those numbers. Also the price they charge for inference is not indicative of the price they're paying to provide inference. Also, at…
Don't even need to get too fancy with it. Open AI has publicly committed to ~$500B in spending over the next several years (nevermind even they don't expect to actually bring that much revenue in) $500B/$100,000 is 5…
...what were you doing before? That's bread and butter development work.
What is?
On the provider end, yes. Not on the consumer end. These are business customers buying a consumer-facing product.
That's...not hard. Pregnancy produces a whole slew of relatively predictable behavior changes. The whole point of recommendation systems is to aggregate data points across services.
What makes it seem like progress isn't flat?
1 Trillion US dollars? 1 trillion dollars is justified because people use chatGPT instead of google sometimes?
>No, that’s not what it means. That's fair but it's what I believe. ...see? Being consistent with stating your beliefs isn't the same as engaging with and about those beliefs. Advertising isn't conversation. Evangelism…
> That's fair. But it's what I believe. That response suggests you aren't interested in discussion or conversation at all. It suggests that your purpose here is to advertise.
Your privacy policy and security page say you do not use any user data for training, it also says you don't store any user data. How do you square that with this comment? - https://tryapril.com/security -…
"The key difference isn’t the words — it’s how you structure the thinking process. By breaking down the task into numbered steps as we see in option B, you’re leveraging how transformer attention works: structured,…
Can I submit a request somewhere to have my data removed?
Can users here submit an issue to have data associated with their account removed?
because the people driving these products are disconnected and deeply unbalanced people
Because the first couple major iterations looked like exponential improvements, and, because VC/private money is stupid, they assumed the trend must continue on the same curve. And because there's something in the human…
If you re--calibrate from any lofty idea of their motives to "get investor money now", this and other moves/announcements make more sense: anything that could look good to an investor. User count going up? Sure. New…
They would say that explicitly, that's the kind of marketing you can't buy.
Did you, the company who built and sold this SaaS product, offer and agree to provide the service your customers paid you for? Did your product fail to render those services? Or do damage to the customer by operating…
Exactly. I have said several times that the largest and most lucrative market for AI and agents in general is liability-laundering. It's just that you can't advertise that, or you ruin the service. And it already does…
It's not reasonable to claim inference is profitable when they've also never released those numbers. Also the price they charge for inference is not indicative of the price they're paying to provide inference. Also, at…
Don't even need to get too fancy with it. Open AI has publicly committed to ~$500B in spending over the next several years (nevermind even they don't expect to actually bring that much revenue in) $500B/$100,000 is 5…
...what were you doing before? That's bread and butter development work.
What is?
On the provider end, yes. Not on the consumer end. These are business customers buying a consumer-facing product.
That's...not hard. Pregnancy produces a whole slew of relatively predictable behavior changes. The whole point of recommendation systems is to aggregate data points across services.
What makes it seem like progress isn't flat?
1 Trillion US dollars? 1 trillion dollars is justified because people use chatGPT instead of google sometimes?
>No, that’s not what it means. That's fair but it's what I believe. ...see? Being consistent with stating your beliefs isn't the same as engaging with and about those beliefs. Advertising isn't conversation. Evangelism…
> That's fair. But it's what I believe. That response suggests you aren't interested in discussion or conversation at all. It suggests that your purpose here is to advertise.
Your privacy policy and security page say you do not use any user data for training, it also says you don't store any user data. How do you square that with this comment? - https://tryapril.com/security -…
"The key difference isn’t the words — it’s how you structure the thinking process. By breaking down the task into numbered steps as we see in option B, you’re leveraging how transformer attention works: structured,…