The Dutch are my "thermometer" for oceans rising, when they start buying real estate in Switzerland, then I'll worry. As for now, there's no evidence whatsoever of oceans rising or any change that could in any way be…
There will always be more wild and more extreme weather events. Nature is random and not static. If one is near water, getting flooded will always be a risk. Not saying it wasn't a problem, not saying it didn't cause…
And by the way, talking about jury, the sentence has always been out (manmade global warming), the "weapon" (CO2), the guilt (humans). As you stated, the sentence was given. The consequence is a warmer world. The cause…
Consensus is a political instrument, not a scientific one. In science it takes only one right idea. As Einstein said: "a thousand experiments couldn't prove me right; a single one can prove me wrong." That NASA site is…
XXIV. Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse By Professor R. W. Wood The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science - Vol. XVII - Sixth Series - January-June 1909 - London: Taylor &…
The same way I cannot understand people that call themselves scientists of whatever been talking for the past years that CO2 can rise temperature, day or night! The anecdote is to be illustrative and not really done…
Since you mentioned the mythbusters, that episode is really wrong, though I really love it because it is the only one of its kind I know of that uses more than two gases. There is a real flaw there, which is the same in…
Great time machine from 1979: that says nothing and proves nothing. It is a real shame NASA is part of this UN (IPCC) joke. Ice and ocean levels will rise and fall as they have done throughout the geological history of…
Except when the prevailing "consensus" is wrong and has been deceitfully pushed forward to enslave everyone else. If one follows the argument for CO2 as culprit for global warming than our energy problems are solved.…
If we don't even know about water, how could we possibly know anything about climate? http://nautil.us/issue/25/water/five-things-we-still-dont-kn... Moreover, if the premise is wrong, the conclusion can only be false,…
Despite what I have said, I have actually been acquiring some "old" books (pre-Internet era, i.e., 1990 or older), even paying more on delivery fee than the book itself. lest to avoid history being rewritten, as…
I don't like paper. I have never liked it. Worse of all, I cannot never read at night, not paper. Never could, don't know why, eyes get red, tired, can't focus. Digital format, yes! When the story is good I almost go…
The ozone anomaly is still there. CFC gases has never really harmed it because those gases are heavier than the air, so it is a bit hard (not impossible, though) for them to get up there. The "hole" has always been over…
Science is not a democracy. There no such thing as science consensus, that is absolutely ridiculous and one more added to the fallacies around the issue. If all living things and the non-living things as well decide…
Well, I stopped dead reading the article right on the first paragraph. I really could not believe. Ice on water does not raise it a millimeter whatsoever. Once again it is just stupid media writing the next Apocalypse…
The Dutch are my "thermometer" for oceans rising, when they start buying real estate in Switzerland, then I'll worry. As for now, there's no evidence whatsoever of oceans rising or any change that could in any way be…
There will always be more wild and more extreme weather events. Nature is random and not static. If one is near water, getting flooded will always be a risk. Not saying it wasn't a problem, not saying it didn't cause…
And by the way, talking about jury, the sentence has always been out (manmade global warming), the "weapon" (CO2), the guilt (humans). As you stated, the sentence was given. The consequence is a warmer world. The cause…
Consensus is a political instrument, not a scientific one. In science it takes only one right idea. As Einstein said: "a thousand experiments couldn't prove me right; a single one can prove me wrong." That NASA site is…
XXIV. Note on the Theory of the Greenhouse By Professor R. W. Wood The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science - Vol. XVII - Sixth Series - January-June 1909 - London: Taylor &…
The same way I cannot understand people that call themselves scientists of whatever been talking for the past years that CO2 can rise temperature, day or night! The anecdote is to be illustrative and not really done…
Since you mentioned the mythbusters, that episode is really wrong, though I really love it because it is the only one of its kind I know of that uses more than two gases. There is a real flaw there, which is the same in…
Great time machine from 1979: that says nothing and proves nothing. It is a real shame NASA is part of this UN (IPCC) joke. Ice and ocean levels will rise and fall as they have done throughout the geological history of…
Except when the prevailing "consensus" is wrong and has been deceitfully pushed forward to enslave everyone else. If one follows the argument for CO2 as culprit for global warming than our energy problems are solved.…
If we don't even know about water, how could we possibly know anything about climate? http://nautil.us/issue/25/water/five-things-we-still-dont-kn... Moreover, if the premise is wrong, the conclusion can only be false,…
Despite what I have said, I have actually been acquiring some "old" books (pre-Internet era, i.e., 1990 or older), even paying more on delivery fee than the book itself. lest to avoid history being rewritten, as…
I don't like paper. I have never liked it. Worse of all, I cannot never read at night, not paper. Never could, don't know why, eyes get red, tired, can't focus. Digital format, yes! When the story is good I almost go…
The ozone anomaly is still there. CFC gases has never really harmed it because those gases are heavier than the air, so it is a bit hard (not impossible, though) for them to get up there. The "hole" has always been over…
Science is not a democracy. There no such thing as science consensus, that is absolutely ridiculous and one more added to the fallacies around the issue. If all living things and the non-living things as well decide…
Well, I stopped dead reading the article right on the first paragraph. I really could not believe. Ice on water does not raise it a millimeter whatsoever. Once again it is just stupid media writing the next Apocalypse…