More CO2 makes plants grow taller, but not with more grain. Being taller, grasses (like wheat) often snap and fall over, particularly in storms. Crop fail. We are at the shallow end of the changes that are coming. An…
https://youtu.be/RJh3TiCFJH4?t=30
There are 3 possibilities: we go extinct we lose civilisation, we do just fine. Science does not us 30 years, it gives us 12, nowhere near enough to build nukes. With the loss of coordinated civilisation, whatever spent…
70 is a a lot closer to the truth. That 11 is a selective figure. None of these numbers includes the carbon used to bulldoze the East side of Japan, or Belarus. And again, as the first attempt was clumsy, and a minimum.
We have the opportunity now, to decide to not kill everything bigger than bacteria. We could shutdown nukes, and store the waste. Or we could go for broke - if we go extinct - everything goes extinct.
Something of a one sided wet dream. If all those NPP's had been built there would have been ... well the article completely fails to mention any downside. And the conclusion: the screw-up was the need to "prepare…
Fundamentalists are immediately, overwhelmingly, correct.
A vote LEAVE will not take us completely out, a vote REMAIN will take us in so deep, we never vote again, the pound becomes 'fixed-rate' and the central banks own us. The EU did not really help Greece, in it's…
Local governments, putting IT out to tender, should describe the VALUE of each feature. EG can work in local dialect (Exxx), source code is openly available (Exxx), we can modify and rebuild (Exxx), nearby support teams…
It's not carbon free.
go-one go-two
go two
More CO2 makes plants grow taller, but not with more grain. Being taller, grasses (like wheat) often snap and fall over, particularly in storms. Crop fail. We are at the shallow end of the changes that are coming. An…
https://youtu.be/RJh3TiCFJH4?t=30
There are 3 possibilities: we go extinct we lose civilisation, we do just fine. Science does not us 30 years, it gives us 12, nowhere near enough to build nukes. With the loss of coordinated civilisation, whatever spent…
70 is a a lot closer to the truth. That 11 is a selective figure. None of these numbers includes the carbon used to bulldoze the East side of Japan, or Belarus. And again, as the first attempt was clumsy, and a minimum.
We have the opportunity now, to decide to not kill everything bigger than bacteria. We could shutdown nukes, and store the waste. Or we could go for broke - if we go extinct - everything goes extinct.
Something of a one sided wet dream. If all those NPP's had been built there would have been ... well the article completely fails to mention any downside. And the conclusion: the screw-up was the need to "prepare…
Fundamentalists are immediately, overwhelmingly, correct.
A vote LEAVE will not take us completely out, a vote REMAIN will take us in so deep, we never vote again, the pound becomes 'fixed-rate' and the central banks own us. The EU did not really help Greece, in it's…
Local governments, putting IT out to tender, should describe the VALUE of each feature. EG can work in local dialect (Exxx), source code is openly available (Exxx), we can modify and rebuild (Exxx), nearby support teams…
It's not carbon free.
go-one go-two
go two