Wasn't this behaviour already ruled unconstitutional in Kyllo v United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States)?
Do you think it's a blessing for dogs engaged in dogfighting to exist rather than not?
People rarely seem to ask these questions when it comes to dogfighting. Somehow we agree it's bad to breed dogs in captivity to suffer when it's a behavior we don't engage in... but when it requires personal change…
Wasn't this behaviour already ruled unconstitutional in Kyllo v United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States)?
Do you think it's a blessing for dogs engaged in dogfighting to exist rather than not?
People rarely seem to ask these questions when it comes to dogfighting. Somehow we agree it's bad to breed dogs in captivity to suffer when it's a behavior we don't engage in... but when it requires personal change…