No. The redux <Provider> component is just a simple React context that uses `children` [1]: <Context.Provider value={contextValue}>{children}</Context.Provider> And `children` behave diferently. `children` is a prop and…
Agree with everything, but saying Next.js is just enough to create a static page is quite the strech.
If the flaw of DDD is that there is no emphasis on when not to use it, then the flaw of Peter's article is that, according to him, you should never use it ("software should be designed around function rather than…
No. The redux <Provider> component is just a simple React context that uses `children` [1]: <Context.Provider value={contextValue}>{children}</Context.Provider> And `children` behave diferently. `children` is a prop and…
Agree with everything, but saying Next.js is just enough to create a static page is quite the strech.
If the flaw of DDD is that there is no emphasis on when not to use it, then the flaw of Peter's article is that, according to him, you should never use it ("software should be designed around function rather than…